Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26669283›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of nutrition2016

Dietary carbohydrate intake, glycaemic load, glycaemic index and ovarian cancer risk in African-American women.

Bo Qin, Patricia G Moorman, Anthony J Alberg, Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan, Melissa Bondy, Michele L Cote, Ellen Funkhouser, Edward S Peters, Ann G Schwartz, Paul Terry and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Integrative Medicine for Ovarian Cancer.Current oncology reports · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Bo Qin1Department of Population Science,Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey,New Brunswick,NJ 08903,USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2110-6050
Patricia G Moorman2Department of Community and Family Medicine,Duke Cancer Institute,Durham,NC 27705,USA.
Anthony J Alberg3Hollings Cancer Center and Department of Public Health Sciences,Medical University of South Carolina,Charleston,SC 29425,USA.
Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan4Case Comprehensive Cancer Center,Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine,Cleveland,OH 44106,USA.
Melissa Bondy5Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences Program,Baylor College of Medicine,Houston,TX 77030,USA.
Michele L Cote6Department of Oncology and the Karmanos Cancer Institute,Population Studies and Disparities Research Program,Wayne State University School of Medicine,Detroit,MI 48201,USA.
Ellen Funkhouser7Division of Preventive Medicine,University of Alabama at Birmingham,Birmingham,AL 35205,USA.
Edward S Peters8Epidemiology Program,Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center School of Public Health,New Orleans,LA 70112,USA.
Ann G Schwartz6Department of Oncology and the Karmanos Cancer Institute,Population Studies and Disparities Research Program,Wayne State University School of Medicine,Detroit,MI 48201,USA.
Paul Terry9Departments of Public Health and Surgery,University of Tennessee-Knoxville,Knoxville,TN 37996,USA.
Joellen M Schildkraut2Department of Community and Family Medicine,Duke Cancer Institute,Durham,NC 27705,USA.
Elisa V Bandera1Department of Population Science,Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey,New Brunswick,NJ 08903,USA.
Duke Medical Center · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USWayne State University · USBaylor College of Medicine · USCase Western Reserve University · USKnoxville College · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USMedical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

TRANSCRIPTIONAL PROFILINGP30CA072720 · NCI · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI Tracie Saunders · 1997 to 2026
$94.5M
Tumor Biology and Microenvironment (Program 1)P30CA022453 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Julie Lynn Boerner · 1985 to 2026
$68.4M
Epidemiology of Ovarian Cancer in African-American WomenR01CA142081 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI SCHILDKRAUT, JOELLEN M. · 2010 to 2015
$10.6M
NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000028CNCI NIH HHS P30 CA022453NCI NIH HHS P30 CA072720NCI NIH HHS P30CA072720NCI NIH HHS P30CA22453NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142081NCI NIH HHS R01CA142081PHS HHS HHSN261201000028C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidemiological evidence regarding the association between carbohydrate intake, glycaemic load (GL) and glycaemic index (GI) and risk of ovarian cancer has been mixed. Little is known about their impact on ovarian cancer risk in African-American women. Associations between carbohydrate quantity and quality and ovarian cancer risk were investigated among 406 cases and 609 controls using data from the African American Cancer Epidemiology Study (AACES). AACES is an ongoing population-based case-control study of ovarian cancer in African-Americans in the USA. Cases were identified through rapid case ascertainment and age- and site-matched controls were identified by random-digit dialling. Dietary information over the year preceding diagnosis or the reference date was obtained using a FFQ. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios and 95% CI adjusted for covariates. The OR comparing the highest quartile of total carbohydrate intake and total sugar intake v. the lowest quartile were 1·57 (95% CI 1·08, 2·28; P trend=0·03) and 1·61 (95% CI 1·12, 2·30; P trend<0·01), respectively. A suggestion of an inverse association was found for fibre intake. Higher GL was positively associated with the risk of ovarian cancer (OR 1·18 for each 10 units/4184 kJ (1000 kcal); 95% CI 1·04, 1·33). No associations were observed for starch or GI. Our findings suggest that high intake of total sugars and GL are associated with greater risk of ovarian cancer in African-American women.

Indexed as

Glycemic IndexGlycemic LoadAdultAgedBlack or African AmericanCase-Control StudiesDietDietary CarbohydratesDietary SucroseFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasm StagingNutrition SurveysOvarian NeoplasmsDietary CarbohydratesDietary SucroseAfrican-American womenCarbohydrateEpidemiologyGI glycaemic indexGL glycaemic loadGlycaemic loadIGF-1 insulin-like growth factor-1Ovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID26669283
PMCPMC4844174
OpenAlexW2199689616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.