ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2015
Long-term outcomes of rotational atherectomy in coronary bifurcation lesions.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The application of rotational atherectomy in PCI for patients with complex coronary artery calcified lesions.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Orbital and Rotational Atherectomy in Calcified Bifurcations: A Walk in the Park?Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to determine the long-term outcomes of bifurcation lesions following a rotational atherectomy (ROTA). In this retrospective study, patients that had undergone a ROTA of the bifurcation coronary lesions in Juntendo University Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) were enrolled between January 2007 and December 2009, and received follow-up for a median duration of 48 months (range, 12-84 months). A total of 337 patients were enrolled. Each patient was treated with an average of 1.2±0.4 ROTA burrs (mean size, 2.9±0.3 mm). Baseline lesion length, reference diameter, minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and percentage of diameter stenosis (%DS) prior to the procedure were comparable between the DM and non-DM patients. Furthermore, MLD, %DS and acute gain following the procedure were similar between the two groups. At follow-up, DM patients exhibited a significantly decreased MLD (1.97±0.92 vs. 2.26±0.73 mm; P=0.0038), increased %DS (27.9±21.3 vs. 20.2±13.3%; P=0.022) and late loss (0.70±0.45 vs. 0.42±0.36 mm; P=0.0047) compared with the non-DM patients. Follow-up examinations (mean duration, 52.2±19.4 months) revealed that the DM patients experienced significantly higher rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) [28 (15.7%) vs. 8 (5.0%); P=0.0011], target lesion (TL) restenosis [46 (25.8%) vs. 20 (12.6%); P=0.0019] and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) [36 (20.2%) vs. 19 (12.0%), P=0.039] compared with the non-DM patients. Although the usage of ROTA and drug-eluting stent evidently improved long-term outcomes in patients with bifurcation lesions, DM remained an independent risk factor for TLR, TL restenosis and MACE. Therefore, the management of DM in bifurcation lesions treated with ROTA requires increased investigation in future clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.