ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2015
Topographic analysis of the mandibular symphysis in a normal occlusion population using cone-beam computed tomography.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative cone-beam computed tomography assessment of anterior loop safety margins using canine-guided osteotomy designs for chin bone harvesting.Journal of dental sciences · 2026Article
- Identification anatomical structures in the interforaminal region as part of pre-surgery evaluation.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Prevalence and extension of the anterior loop of the mental nerve in different populations and CBCT imaging settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Imaging science in dentistry · 2022Review
- Anatomical Variations of the Mandibular Symphysis in a Normal Occlusion Population Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.Maedica · 2021Article
- Analysis of Alveolar Bone Morphology of the Maxillary Central and Lateral Incisors with Normal Occlusion.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
At present, the relationship between the morphological characteristics of the sympheseal region and occlusion has not been well documented. The aim of the present study was to investigate the following, using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT): Interforaminal distance, the anterior loop, labial bone thickness at the tooth apex, cortical bone thickness, and the basal bone height from the apex of the tooth to the base of the mandible. Three-dimensional CBCT was performed on 20 normal occlusion subjects (9 males and 11 females; mean age=21.9±3.0 years); the mean interforaminal distance was 53.1±3.6 mm, with 85% of the participants demonstrating a mental foramen located below the second premolars on both sides. The mean anterior loop was 1.9±0.8 mm, the mean horizontal distance value was 4.5±1.3 mm, and the mean cortical bone thickness value was 2.3±0.5 mm. An increasing tendency for cortical bone thickness was seen from the central incisor to the second premolar. The mean vertical distance value was 20.3±3.1 mm. Decreasing tendency of vertical distance was seen from the central incisor to the second premolar. Furthermore, the width (mental foramina of both sides and their anterior loops), height (teeth apices and the inferior border of the mandible), depth (cortical bone thickness of the symphysis), and safety margins for vital anatomical structures (anterior loop, tooth apex, and inferior border of mandible) should be taken into account prior to symphyseal block-bone harvesting. The results of the present study suggested that a pre-operative evaluation with CBCT may be useful for diagnosis and treatment planning, and for minimizing complications during block-bone graft.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.