Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26668558›Full record

ArticleAnnals of burns and fire disasters2015

[Not Available].

Jf Arnould, R Le Floch

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of burns and fire disasters, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jf ArnouldService de Réanimation Chirurgicale et des brûlés, CHU Nantes, France.
R Le FlochService de Réanimation Chirurgicale et des brûlés, CHU Nantes, France.
Imation (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Local or general fungal infection remain a very serious event in burns. Burns have numerous risk factors for such, infections associated with depressed immunity. Candida, Aspergillus and mucor fungi prevail in wound infections. The two latest are especially serious and impairing. Diagnosis is based on anatomo-pathological and mycological examination of skin samples. Treatment is mainly surgical. Medical therapy depends on antifungal susceptibility. Most fungemias are candidemias. Diagnosis is difficult and often based on clinical suspicion. Treatment uses echinocandin and fluconazole.

Identifiers

PMID26668558
PMCPMC4665176
OpenAlexW4292658583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.