Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26668516›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of gastroenterology2015

Hybrid therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

Ping-I Hsu, Pei-Chin Lin, David Y Graham

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Therapeutic advances and future directions inFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Evolution ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Update on the first-line treatment ofTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2022
    Review
  10. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection: The Bhubaneswar Consensus Report of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  11. The status and progress of first-line treatment againstTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Update on the first-line treatment forBiomarker research · 2017
    Review
  18. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori Infection.Current gastroenterology reports · 2016
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Optimal First-Line Treatment forGastroenterology research and practice · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ping-I HsuPing-I Hsu, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital and National Yang-Ming University, Kaohsiung 813, Taiwan.
Pei-Chin LinPing-I Hsu, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital and National Yang-Ming University, Kaohsiung 813, Taiwan.
David Y GrahamPing-I Hsu, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital and National Yang-Ming University, Kaohsiung 813, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo compare the effectiveness of hybrid therapy with other recommended regimens using meta-analysis.

methodsBibliographical searches for randomized trials comparing hybrid and other therapies were performed in PubMed, the Cochrane Library and relevant congresses up to February 2015 using the following keywords (all fields and/or MeSH): ("Helicobacter pylori" or "H. pylori") and ("hybrid therapy" or "sequential-concomitant therapy"). Meta-analyses were performed with Cochrane Review Manager 5.1. The random effect model proposed by DerSimonian and Laird and the Mantel-Haenszel method were used to estimate the pooled relative risk and 95%CI of the efficacy outcomes between hybrid therapy and other eradication therapies.

resultsEight studies (2516 subjects) met entry criteria. The antimicrobial resistance in the study groups ranged from 6.9% to 23.5%. The mean cure rates of hybrid therapy by intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol analyses were 88.5% (n = 1207; range: 80.0% to 97.4%) and 93.3% (n = 1109; range: 85.7% to 99.1%), respectively. Meta-analysis showed there was no significant difference in ITT eradication rate between hybrid and sequential therapy (relative risk: 1.01; 95%CI: 0.92-1.11). Subgroup analysis revealed hybrid therapy was more effective than sequential therapy in the non-Italian populations (95%CI: 1.01-1.18) and was only less effective in one, Italian population (95%CI: 0.83-0.98). There was no significant difference in eradication rate between hybrid therapy and concomitant therapy (95%CI: 0.93-1.02). No head-to-head comparisons of hybrid therapy and standard triple therapy or bismuth quadruple therapy were found. However, a multicenter, randomized trial showed that reverse hybrid therapy was superior to standard triple therapy (95.5% vs 88.6% ITT; P = 0.011).

conclusionHybrid therapy appears to be an effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment for H. pylori infection in the era of increasing antibiotic resistance.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriProton Pump InhibitorsChi-Square DistributionDrug Resistance, BacterialDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansOdds RatioRemission InductionTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsProton Pump InhibitorsConcomitant therapyHelicobacter pyloriHybrid therapySequential therapyTriple therapy

Identifiers

PMID26668516
PMCPMC4671047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.