Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26668509›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2015

Clinicopathological characteristics of clinical early gastric cancer in the upper-third stomach.

Daisuke Ichikawa, Shuhei Komatsu, Toshiyuki Kosuga, Hirotaka Konishi, Kazuma Okamoto, Atsushi Shiozaki, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Eigo Otsuji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Surgical outcomes and risk assessment for anastomotic complications after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with double-flap technique for upper-third gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daisuke IchikawaDaisuke Ichikawa, Shuhei Komatsu, Toshiyuki Kosuga, Hirotaka Konishi, Kazuma Okamoto, Atsushi Shiozaki, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Eigo Otsuji, Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 6028566, Japan.
Shuhei KomatsuDaisuke Ichikawa, Shuhei Komatsu, Toshiyuki Kosuga, Hirotaka Konishi, Kazuma Okamoto, Atsushi Shiozaki, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Eigo Otsuji, Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 6028566, Japan.
Toshiyuki KosugaDaisuke Ichikawa, Shuhei Komatsu, Toshiyuki Kosuga, Hirotaka Konishi, Kazuma Okamoto, Atsushi Shiozaki, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Eigo Otsuji, Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 6028566, Japan.
Hirotaka KonishiDaisuke Ichikawa, Shuhei Komatsu, Toshiyuki Kosuga, Hirotaka Konishi, Kazuma Okamoto, Atsushi Shiozaki, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Eigo Otsuji, Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 6028566, Japan.
Kazuma OkamotoDaisuke Ichikawa, Shuhei Komatsu, Toshiyuki Kosuga, Hirotaka Konishi, Kazuma Okamoto, Atsushi Shiozaki, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Eigo Otsuji, Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 6028566, Japan.
Atsushi ShiozakiDaisuke Ichikawa, Shuhei Komatsu, Toshiyuki Kosuga, Hirotaka Konishi, Kazuma Okamoto, Atsushi Shiozaki, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Eigo Otsuji, Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 6028566, Japan.
Hitoshi FujiwaraDaisuke Ichikawa, Shuhei Komatsu, Toshiyuki Kosuga, Hirotaka Konishi, Kazuma Okamoto, Atsushi Shiozaki, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Eigo Otsuji, Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 6028566, Japan.
Eigo OtsujiDaisuke Ichikawa, Shuhei Komatsu, Toshiyuki Kosuga, Hirotaka Konishi, Kazuma Okamoto, Atsushi Shiozaki, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Eigo Otsuji, Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto 6028566, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo elucidate the clinicopathological characteristics of clinically early gastric cancer in the upper-third stomach and to clarify treatment precautions.

methodsA total of 683 patients with clinical early gastric cancer were enrolled in this retrospective study, 128 of whom had gastric cancer in the upper-third stomach (U group). All patients underwent a double contrast barium examination, endoscopy, and computed tomography (CT), and were diagnosed preoperatively based on the findings obtained. The clinicopathological features of these patients were compared with those of patients with gastric cancer in the middle- and lower-third stomach (ML group). We also compared clinicopathological factors between accurate-diagnosis and under-diagnosis groups in order to identify factors affecting the accuracy of a preoperative diagnosis of tumor depth.

resultsPatients in the U group were older (P = 0.029), had a higher ratio of males to females (P = 0.015), and had more histologically differentiated tumors (P = 0.007) than patients in the ML group. A clinical under-diagnosis occurred in 57 out of 683 patients (8.3%), and was more frequent in the U group than in the ML group (16.4% vs 6.3%, P < 0.0001). Therefore, the rates of lymph node metastasis and lymphatic invasion were slightly higher in the U group than in the ML group (P = 0.071 and 0.082, respectively). An under-diagnosis was more frequent in histologically undifferentiated tumors (P = 0.094) and in those larger than 4 cm (P = 0.024). The median follow-up period after surgery was 56 mo (range, 1-186 mo). Overall, survival and disease-specific survival rates were significantly lower in the U group than in the ML group (P = 0.016 and 0.020, respectively). However, limited operation-related cancer recurrence was not detected in the U group in the present study.

conclusionClinical early gastric cancer in the upper-third stomach has distinguishable characteristics that increase the risk of a clinical under-diagnosis, especially in patients with larger or undifferentiated tumors.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCell DifferentiationDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGastrectomyGastroscopyHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesDiagnosisGastric cancerUpper-third stomach

Identifiers

PMID26668509
PMCPMC4671040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.