ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2015
Interval colorectal carcinoma: An unsolved debate.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality indicators in colonoscopies performed in digestive endoscopy services in northeast Brazil.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial-intelligence- and multi-omics-guided predictive and drug repurposing framework construction for colorectal cancer: evidence from succinylation-neutrophil signatures.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Appropriateness of Recommendations for Surveillance Colonoscopy After Polypectomy-A Comparison of Adherence to the 2012 and 2020 USMSTF Guidelines.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Article
- Proline-rich acidic protein 1 upregulates mitotic arrest deficient 1 to promote cisplatin-resistance of colorectal carcinoma by restraining mitotic checkpoint complex assembly.Journal of Cancer · 2023Article
- Adaptation of Clinical Practice Guideline for Colorectal Cancer Screening in People with Average Risk in Isfahan Province.International journal of preventive medicine · 2022Article
- Sessile serrated lesion detection rates during average risk screening colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature.Endoscopy international open · 2021Review
- Training a computer-aided polyp detection system to detect sessile serrated adenomas using public domain colonoscopy videos.Endoscopy international open · 2020Article
- Colorectal Cancer Survival in 50- to 69-Year-Olds after Introducing the Faecal Immunochemical Test.Cancers · 2020Article
- Article
- Characteristics of minute T1 colorectal cancer in relevance to pathology and treatment.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2020Article
- Integrated Imaging Methodology Detects Claudin-1 Expression in Premalignant Nonpolypoid and Polypoid Colonic Epithelium in Mice.Clinical and translational gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Significant Variation in the Detection Rates of Proximal Serrated Polyps Among Academic Gastroenterologists, Community Gastroenterologists, and Colorectal Surgeons in a Single Tertiary Care Center.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2019Article
- Challenges Facing the Detection of Colonic Polyps: What Can Deep Learning Do?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019Review
- A short telephone-call reminder improves bowel preparation, quality indicators and patient satisfaction with first colonoscopy.Endoscopy international open · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal carcinoma (CRC), as the third most common new cancer diagnosis, poses a significant health risk to the population. Interval CRCs are those that appear after a negative screening test or examination. The development of interval CRCs has been shown to be multifactorial: location of exam-academic institution versus community hospital, experience of the endoscopist, quality of the procedure, age of the patient, flat versus polypoid neoplasia, genetics, hereditary gastrointestinal neoplasia, and most significantly missed or incompletely excised lesions. The rate of interval CRCs has decreased in the last decade, which has been ascribed to an increased understanding of interval disease and technological advances in the screening of high risk individuals. In this article, we aim to review the literature with regard to the multifactorial nature of interval CRCs and provide the most recent developments regarding this important gastrointestinal entity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.