Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26668482›Full record

ArticleJournal of international oral health : JIOH2015

Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice about Research Ethics among Dental Faculty in the North India.

Kiran Kumar Mallela, Rachit Walia, Chaitra Devi Tm, Maneesha Das, Shipra Sepolia, Priyank Sethi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of international oral health : JIOH, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Research Ethics among Researchers in Nepal.JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring Knowledge and Perceptions of Faculty Members about Authorship: A Study from Jordan.European online journal of natural and social sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kiran Kumar MallelaProfessor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Rachit WaliaReader, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, Krishna Dental College, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Chaitra Devi TmSenior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics College, College of Dental Science, Amargadh, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India.
Maneesha DasSenior Lecturer, Department of Conservative and Endodontics, Saraswati Dhanwantari Dental College and Hospital, Postgraduate and Research Institute, Parbhani, Maharashtra, India.
Shipra SepoliaRegistrar, Department of Periodontics, Sher-I-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Priyank SethiSenior Lecturer, Department of Conservative and Endodontics, Saraswati Dhanwantari Dental College and Hospital, Postgraduate and Research Institute, Parbhani, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch activities in dentistry are increased greatly in India during the recent decade, but there is limited of information about the knowledge and attitude of dental faculty for research ethics. To assess the knowledge and attitudes of dental faculty of North India regarding research ethics. MATERIALS AND

methodsThrough convenience sampling, a questionnaire was sent either via printed copies or E-mails to 1240 dental faculty, while protecting confidentiality and anonymity of all the participants.

resultsOur response rate was 76% (942). Majority (>90%) are aware of ethical committee but have poor knowledge (8-35%) about various ethical guidelines laid down at international level; however almost 20% believe that research ethics committees would delay research. A large number of researchers (78%) want some training in research ethics. There is fair knowledge about informed consent among researchers.

conclusionsWe conclude that ethical norms should be strictly followed by giving due respect to confidentiality or privacy of research participants to achieve the goal of minimal risks and maximum benefits to patients and there is need of training to researchers and students to make them aware about various research principles.

Indexed as

Informed consentresearch ethical committeeresearch ethics

Identifiers

PMID26668482
PMCPMC4672855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.