Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26668366›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Recombination patterns in maize reveal limits to crossover homeostasis.

Gaganpreet K Sidhu, Celestia Fang, Mischa A Olson, Matthieu Falque, Olivier C Martin, Wojciech P Pawlowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Meiosis in bulbous flower speciesFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  9. Molecular mechanisms and regulation of recombination frequency and distribution in plants.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Exploring impact of recombination landscapes on breeding outcomes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Crossover patterning in plants.Plant reproduction · 2023
    Review
  14. Dissecting the Meiotic Recombination Patterns in aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Crossover interference mechanism: New lessons from plants.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gaganpreet K SidhuSection of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853;
Celestia FangSection of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853;
Mischa A OlsonSection of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853;
Matthieu FalqueGénétique Quantitative et Evolution-Le Moulon, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique/Université Paris-Sud/CNRS/AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Olivier C MartinGénétique Quantitative et Evolution-Le Moulon, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique/Université Paris-Sud/CNRS/AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Wojciech P PawlowskiSection of Plant Biology, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853; wp45@cornell.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During meiotic recombination, double-strand breaks (DSBs) are formed in chromosomal DNA and then repaired as either crossovers (COs) or non-crossovers (NCOs). In most taxa, the number of DSBs vastly exceeds the number of COs. COs are required for generating genetic diversity in the progeny, as well as proper chromosome segregation. Their formation is tightly controlled so that there is at least one CO per pair of homologous chromosomes whereas the maximum number of COs per chromosome pair is fairly limited. One of the main mechanisms controlling the number of recombination events per meiosis is CO homeostasis, which maintains a stable CO number even when the DSB number is dramatically altered. The existence of CO homeostasis has been reported in several species, including mouse, yeast, and Caenorhabditis elegans. However, it is not known whether homeostasis exists in the same form in all species. In addition, the studies of homeostasis have been conducted using mutants and/or transgenic lines exhibiting fairly severe meiotic phenotypes, and it is unclear how important homeostasis is under normal physiological conditions. We found that, in maize, CO control is robust only to ensure one CO per chromosome pair. However, once this limit is reached, the CO number is linearly related to the DSB number. We propose that CO control is a multifaceted process whose different aspects have a varying degree of importance in different species.

Indexed as

Crossing Over, GeneticHomologous RecombinationAnimalsChromatinChromosomes, PlantDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedHomeostasisMeiosisMiceMicroscopy, FluorescencePlant ProteinsRad51 RecombinaseZea maysChromatinPlant ProteinsRad51 Recombinasecrossing-overcrossover homeostasisdouble-strand breaksmeiosisrecombination

Identifiers

PMID26668366
PMCPMC4703008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.