Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26668350›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2016

Analysis of Impact of Post-Treatment Biopsies in Phase I Clinical Trials.

Randy F Sweis, Michael W Drazer, Mark J Ratain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The use of research biopsies in oncology trials: challenges and controversies.Journal of hospital management and health policy · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Underreporting of Research Biopsies from Clinical Trials in Oncology.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Burdensome Research Procedures in Trials: Why Less Is More.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Analysis of Impact of Post-Treatment Biopsies in Phase I Clinical Trials.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Randy F SweisRandy F. Sweis and Michael W. Drazer, University of Chicago; Mark J. Ratain, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Michael W DrazerRandy F. Sweis and Michael W. Drazer, University of Chicago; Mark J. Ratain, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Mark J RatainRandy F. Sweis and Michael W. Drazer, University of Chicago; Mark J. Ratain, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL. mratain@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu.

Funding

Re-Entry Supplement: Investigation of Oral Microbial Enzymes for the Detection and Treatment of Periodontal DiseaseUL1TR002489 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, SHAHEEN, NICHOLAS J · 2018 to 2022
$48.6M
North Carolina Translational & Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UL1TR001111 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, CAREY, TIMOTHY S · 2013 to 2017
$43.9M
BASIC RESEARCH TRAINING IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGYT32CA009566 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI OLUFUNMILAYO F. OLOPADE · 1987 to 2026
$10.5M
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICST32GM007019 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Peter Hugh O'Donnell, MARK J RATAIN · 1985 to 2026
$8.7M
Behavioral Economics and Improving Chemotherapy Decisions for Advanced CancerK24CA181510 · NCI · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI KEATING, NANCY L · 2014 to 2018
$867k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001111NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR001111NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002489NCI NIH HHS K24CA181510NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009566NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe use of biopsy-derived pharmacodynamic biomarkers is increasing in early-phase clinical trials. It remains unknown whether drug development is accelerated or enhanced by their use. We examined the impact of biopsy-derived pharmacodynamic biomarkers on subsequent drug development through a comprehensive analysis of phase I oncology studies from 2003 to 2010 and subsequent publications citing the original trials.

methodsWe conducted a search to identify and examine publications of phase I oncology studies including the use of biopsy-derived pharmacodynamic biomarkers between 2003 and 2010. Characteristics of those studies were extracted and analyzed, along with outcomes from the biomarker data. We then compiled and reviewed publications of subsequent phase II and III trials citing the original phase I biomarker studies to determine the impact on drug development.

resultsWe identified 4,840 phase I oncology publications between 2003 and 2010. Seventy-two studies included a biopsy-derived pharmacodynamic biomarker. The proportion of biomarker studies including nondiagnostic biopsies increased over time (P = .002). A minimum of 1,873 tumor biopsies were documented in the 72 studies, 12 of which reported a statistically significant biomarker result. Thirty-three percent of studies (n = 24) were referenced by subsequent publications specifically with regard to the biomarkers. Only five positive biomarker studies were cited subsequently, and maximum tolerated dose was used for subsequent drug development in all cases.

conclusionDespite their increased use, the impact of biopsy-derived pharmacodynamic biomarkers in phase I oncology studies on subsequent drug development remains uncertain. No impact on subsequent dose or schedule was demonstrated. This issue requires further evaluation, given the risk and cost of such studies.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBiopsyClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicHumansNeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID26668350
PMCPMC4872035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.