ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2016
Analysis of Impact of Post-Treatment Biopsies in Phase I Clinical Trials.
Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation of a Multicenter Biobanking Collaboration for Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Biomarker Discovery Based on Fresh Frozen Pretreatment Tumor Tissue Biopsies.The oncologist · 2017Trial
- The use of pharmacodynamic results for recommended phase II decision making in oncology clinical trials.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2026Review
- Dermatopathological Challenges in Objectively Characterizing Immunotherapy Response in Mycosis Fungoides.Dermatopathology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Model-Informed Selection of the Recommended Phase 2 Dosage for Anti-TIGIT Immunotherapy Leveraging co-Expressed PD-1 Inhibitor Target Engagement.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- From ownership to custodianship of tumor biopsy tissue in genomic testing: a mixed methods study of patient views.The oncologist · 2024Article
- Realizing the promise of Project Optimus: Challenges and emerging opportunities for dose optimization in oncology drug development.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2024Review
- Analyses of the Rationale and Implementation of Research Biopsies in Oncology Clinical Trials at a Tertiary Cancer Center.The oncologist · 2021Article
- Reimagining Global Oncology Clinical Trials for the Postpandemic Era: A Call to Arms.JCO global oncology · 2020Article
- The use of research biopsies in oncology trials: challenges and controversies.Journal of hospital management and health policy · 2019Article
- Strategies for clinical development of monoclonal antibodies beyond first-in-human trials: tested doses and rationale for dose selection.British journal of cancer · 2018Article
- The changing face of clinical trials in the personalized medicine and immuno-oncology era: report from the international congress on clinical trials in Oncology & Hemato-Oncology (ICTO 2017).Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2017Article
- Underreporting of Research Biopsies from Clinical Trials in Oncology.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017Article
- Mechanistic and pharmacologic insights on immune checkpoint inhibitors.Pharmacological research · 2017Review
- Burdensome Research Procedures in Trials: Why Less Is More.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2017Article
- Prospective Feasibility Study for Using Cell-Free Circulating Tumor DNA-Guided Therapy in Refractory Metastatic Solid Cancers: An Interim Analysis.JCO precision oncology · 2017Article
- Pharmacodynamic endpoints as clinical trial objectives to answer important questions in oncology drug development.Seminars in oncology · 2016Review
- Analysis of Impact of Post-Treatment Biopsies in Phase I Clinical Trials.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe use of biopsy-derived pharmacodynamic biomarkers is increasing in early-phase clinical trials. It remains unknown whether drug development is accelerated or enhanced by their use. We examined the impact of biopsy-derived pharmacodynamic biomarkers on subsequent drug development through a comprehensive analysis of phase I oncology studies from 2003 to 2010 and subsequent publications citing the original trials.
methodsWe conducted a search to identify and examine publications of phase I oncology studies including the use of biopsy-derived pharmacodynamic biomarkers between 2003 and 2010. Characteristics of those studies were extracted and analyzed, along with outcomes from the biomarker data. We then compiled and reviewed publications of subsequent phase II and III trials citing the original phase I biomarker studies to determine the impact on drug development.
resultsWe identified 4,840 phase I oncology publications between 2003 and 2010. Seventy-two studies included a biopsy-derived pharmacodynamic biomarker. The proportion of biomarker studies including nondiagnostic biopsies increased over time (P = .002). A minimum of 1,873 tumor biopsies were documented in the 72 studies, 12 of which reported a statistically significant biomarker result. Thirty-three percent of studies (n = 24) were referenced by subsequent publications specifically with regard to the biomarkers. Only five positive biomarker studies were cited subsequently, and maximum tolerated dose was used for subsequent drug development in all cases.
conclusionDespite their increased use, the impact of biopsy-derived pharmacodynamic biomarkers in phase I oncology studies on subsequent drug development remains uncertain. No impact on subsequent dose or schedule was demonstrated. This issue requires further evaluation, given the risk and cost of such studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.