Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26668247›Full record

ArticleOccupational medicine (Oxford, England)2016

Patient-reported factors influencing return to work after joint replacement.

M Bardgett, J Lally, A Malviya, B Kleim, D Deehan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational medicine (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Factors influencing return to work after hip and knee arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M BardgettDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK, michelle.bardgett@nuth.nhs.uk.
J LallyInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK.
A MalviyaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Tyne and Wear NE29 8NH, UK.
B KleimInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK.
D DeehanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn increasing number of patients in the working population are undergoing total hip and knee replacement for osteoarthritis and the timing and success of return to work (RTW) is becoming increasingly important as a measure of success for these patients. There is limited understanding of the patient variables that determine the ability to RTW.

aimsTo explore the factors influencing RTW following hip and knee replacement from the patient's perspective.

methodsA cross-sectional population-based postal survey carried out with patients of working age after hip and knee replacement surgery in a UK teaching hospital. Free text comments were collected regarding the experiences of patients returning to work following hip and knee replacement. Qualitative thematic analysis was undertaken to identify the factors influencing RTW from the patient's perspective.

resultsFrom the patients' perspective three key factors were identified that influenced RTW. Patients reported an improved physical and psychological performance at work after surgery in comparison to pre-operative functioning, although there was a lack of informed advice regarding RTW after surgery. Workplace support and adaptation of the job role enhanced the experience of RTW.

conclusionsReturn to work is influenced by a combination of patient, clinician and occupational factors. The relationship between each of these needs to be explored in greater depth through further qualitative work to gain a wider understanding of the variables influencing patients' RTW following hip and knee replacement.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeReturn to WorkWorkplaceCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansMaleOccupational HealthPatient SatisfactionQualitative ResearchRecovery of FunctionSurveys and QuestionnairesQualitative; return to worktotal hip replacementtotal knee replacement.

Identifiers

PMID26668247
PMCPMC5916315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.