Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26668027›Full record

ArticleClinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN2016

Rapid Response to Cyclosporin A and Favorable Renal Outcome in Nongenetic Versus Genetic Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome.

Anja K Büscher, Bodo B Beck, Anette Melk, Julia Hoefele, Birgitta Kranz, Daniel Bamborschke, Sabrina Baig, Bärbel Lange-Sperandio, Theresa Jungraithmayr, Lutz T Weber and 6 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The CaPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Anja K BüscherPediatric Nephrology, Pediatrics II, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany;
Bodo B BeckInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
Anette MelkPediatric Nephrology, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany;
Julia HoefeleCenter for Human Genetics and Laboratory Medicine Dr. Klein, Dr. Rost and Colleagues, Martinsried, Germany;
Birgitta KranzPediatric Nephrology, University Children's Hospital, Munster, Germany;
Daniel BamborschkeInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
Sabrina BaigPediatric Nephrology, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany;
Bärbel Lange-SperandioPediatric Nephrology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany;
Theresa JungraithmayrPediatric Nephrology, University Children's Hospital Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria;
Lutz T WeberPediatric Nephrology, University Children's Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany;
Markus J KemperPediatric Nephrology, University Children´s Hospital Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; and.
Burkhard TönshoffDepartment of Pediatric Nephrology, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Peter F HoyerPediatric Nephrology, Pediatrics II, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany;
Martin KonradPediatric Nephrology, University Children's Hospital, Munster, Germany;
Stefanie WeberPediatric Nephrology, Pediatrics II, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; stefanie.weber@uk-essen.de.
German Pediatric Nephrology Association (GPN)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesTreatment of congenital nephrotic syndrome (CNS) and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is demanding, and renal prognosis is poor. Numerous causative gene mutations have been identified in SRNS that affect the renal podocyte. In the era of high-throughput sequencing techniques, patients with nongenetic SRNS frequently escape the scientific interest. We here present the long-term data of the German CNS/SRNS Follow-Up Study, focusing on the response to cyclosporin A (CsA) in patients with nongenetic versus genetic disease. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Cross-sectional and longitudinal clinical data were collected from 231 patients with CNS/SRNS treated at eight university pediatric nephrology units with a median observation time of 113 months (interquartile range, 50-178). Genotyping was performed systematically in all patients.

resultsThe overall mutation detection rate was high at 57% (97% in CNS and 41% in SRNS); 85% of all mutations were identified by the analysis of three single genes only (NPHS1, NPHS2, and WT1), accounting for 92% of all mutations in patients with CNS and 79% of all mutations in patients with SRNS. Remission of the disease in nongenetic SRNS was observed in 78% of patients after a median treatment period of 2.5 months; 82% of nongenetic patients responded within 6 months of therapy, and 98% of patients with nongenetic SRNS and CsA-induced complete remission (normalbuminemia and no proteinuria) maintained a normal renal function. Genetic SRNS, on the contrary, is associated with a high rate of ESRD in 66% of patients. Only 3% of patients with genetic SRNS experienced a complete remission and 16% of patients with genetic SRNS experienced a partial remission after CsA therapy.

conclusionsThe efficacy of CsA is high in nonhereditary SRNS, with an excellent prognosis of renal function in the large majority of patients. CsA should be given for a minimum period of 6 months in these patients with nongenetic SRNS. In genetic SRNS, response to CsA was low and restricted to exceptional patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAustriaBiopsyChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesCyclosporineDisease ProgressionDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGermanyHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInfantIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsCyclosporineImmunosuppressive AgentsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsnephrinNPHS2 proteinWT1 protein, humanWT1 Proteinscyclosporine AFSGShumanskidney failure, chronicmutationNPHS1NPHS2steroid resistant nephrotic syndromeWT1

Identifiers

PMID26668027
PMCPMC4741047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.