Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26667838›Full record

ReviewInfection and immunity2015

A Coming of Age Story: Chlamydia in the Post-Genetic Era.

Anna J Hooppaw, Derek J Fisher

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infection and immunity, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prevalence ofEuropean journal of microbiology & immunology · 2019
    Article
  10. ChlamBase: a curated model organism database for the Chlamydia research community.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Genetic Inactivation ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Chlamydia cell biology and pathogenesis.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2016
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna J HooppawDepartment of Microbiology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, USA.
Derek J FisherDepartment of Microbiology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, USA dfisher@siu.edu.
Southern Illinois University Carbondale · US

Funding

Unraveling the role of protein phosphorylation in the regulation of development in Chlamydia trachomatisR15AI109566 · NIAID · SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CARBONDALE · PI FISHER, DEREK JAMES · 2014 to 2020
$887k
Development of gene inactivation methods for Chlamydia spp.R21AI115238 · NIAID · SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CARBONDALE · PI FISHER, DEREK JAMES · 2015 to 2016
$406k
NIAID NIH HHS 1R15AI109566-01A1NIAID NIH HHS 1R21AI115238-01NIAID NIH HHS R15 AI109566NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI115238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chlamydia spp. are ubiquitous, obligate, intracellular Gram-negative bacterial pathogens that undergo a unique biphasic developmental cycle transitioning between the infectious, extracellular elementary body and the replicative, intracellular reticulate body. The primary Chlamydia species associated with human disease are C. trachomatis, which is the leading cause of both reportable bacterial sexually transmitted infections and preventable blindness, and C. pneumoniae, which infects the respiratory tract and is associated with cardiovascular disease. Collectively, these pathogens are a significant source of morbidity and pose a substantial financial burden on the global economy. Past efforts to elucidate virulence mechanisms of these unique and important pathogens were largely hindered by an absence of genetic methods. Watershed studies in 2011 and 2012 demonstrated that forward and reverse genetic approaches were feasible with Chlamydia and that shuttle vectors could be selected and maintained within the bacterium. While these breakthroughs have led to a steady expansion of the chlamydial genetic tool kit, there are still roads left to be traveled. This minireview provides a synopsis of the currently available genetic methods for Chlamydia along with a comparison to the methods used in other obligate intracellular bacteria. Limitations and advantages of these techniques will be discussed with an eye toward the methods still needed, and how the current state of the art for genetics in obligate intracellular bacteria could direct future technological advances for Chlamydia.

Indexed as

AnimalsChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisGenomicsHumans

Identifiers

PMID26667838
PMCPMC4771359
OpenAlexW2247315273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.