Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26667819›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2015

Screening of patients with augmented renal clearance in ICU: taking into account the CKD-EPI equation, the age, and the cause of admission.

Stéphanie Ruiz, Vincent Minville, Karim Asehnoune, Marie Virtos, Bernard Georges, Olivier Fourcade, Jean-Marie Conil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Augmented renal clearance in neurocritical patients: An epidemiological investigation and risk-factor analysis.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stéphanie RuizDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Toulouse, University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France. ruiz.stephanie@chu-toulouse.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3111-5938
Vincent MinvilleDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Toulouse, University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France. minville.v@chu-toulouse.fr.
Karim AsehnouneService d'Anesthésie Réanimation, CHU de Nantes, 1 place Alexis Ricordeau, 44093, Nantes Cedex 1, France. karim.asehnoune@chu-nantes.fr.
Marie VirtosDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Toulouse, University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France. virtos.m@chu-toulouse.fr.
Bernard GeorgesDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Toulouse, University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France. georges.b@chu-toulouse.fr.
Olivier FourcadeDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Toulouse, University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France. fourcade.o@chu-toulouse.fr.
Jean-Marie ConilDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Toulouse, University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France. conil.jm@chu-toulouse.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn ICU patients with normal serum creatinine (SCr), a state of increased renal drug excretion has been described (creatinine clearance ≥130 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), and named augmented renal clearance (ARC). In ICU patients, the accuracy of GFR estimates is insufficient. However, in clinical practice, the physician has not at one's disposal patient measured creatinine clearance (CrCl) when prescribing. The primary objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of 4 formulas to estimate GFR (Cockcroft-Gault (CG), Robert, sMDRD, and CKD-EPI formulas) with other covariates to detect ARC in ICU patients.

methodsWe enroled 360 consecutive ICU patients with normal SCr in this prospective observational study conducted in a primary teaching hospital. Comparisons between CrCl values and 4 estimated GFR (eGFR) formulas were estimated.

resultsIn these 360 patients, ARC was observed in 33 % of patients most of them trauma. Individual predictive values of equations were poor and the phenomenon increased in ARC subgroup. CG and CKD-EPI were more accurate to detect an ARC. Multivariable analysis showed that the best-fitting model included 3 factors independently correlated to ARC: trauma patients, cut-off values of age ≤58 years, and CKD-EPI more than 108 ml/min/1.73 m(2).

conclusionsIn ICU patients with normal SCr, eGFR formulas are imprecise in assessing CrCl. If measured CrCl must be ideally used to detect modifications of the renal function, in clinical practice, age, reason for admission, and CKD-EPI could be used as screening tool to identify ARC.

Indexed as

Critically ill patientsGFR estimationsMeasured creatinine clearanceScreening ARC

Identifiers

PMID26667819
PMCPMC4681181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.