Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26667626›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2016

Primary care physicians and oncologists are partners in cancer announcement.

Marie-Eve Rougé Bugat, Christelle Omnes, Cyrille Delpierre, Emile Escourrou, Nathalie Boussier, Stéphane Oustric, Jean-Pierre Delord, Eric Bauvin, Pascale Grosclaude

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Professionals' Perceptions of the Colorectal Cancer Pathway: Results of a Co-Constructed Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marie-Eve Rougé BugatUniversity Department of General Practice, Toulouse-Rangueil Faculty of Medicine, 133 route de Narbonne, 31400, Toulouse, France. marieeve.rouge-bugat@dumg-toulouse.fr.
Christelle OmnesUniversity Department of General Practice, Toulouse-Rangueil Faculty of Medicine, 133 route de Narbonne, 31400, Toulouse, France.
Cyrille DelpierreInserm U1027, Faculty of Medicine, 37 allées Jules Guesde, 31073, Toulouse, France.
Emile EscourrouUniversity Department of General Practice, Toulouse-Rangueil Faculty of Medicine, 133 route de Narbonne, 31400, Toulouse, France.
Nathalie BoussierUniversity Department of General Practice, Toulouse-Rangueil Faculty of Medicine, 133 route de Narbonne, 31400, Toulouse, France.
Stéphane OustricUniversity Department of General Practice, Toulouse-Rangueil Faculty of Medicine, 133 route de Narbonne, 31400, Toulouse, France.
Jean-Pierre DelordUniversity Department of Oncology, Toulouse University Cancer Institute IUCT-Oncopole, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31059, Toulouse Cedex 9, France.
Eric BauvinRegional Cancer Network Oncomip, IUCT-Oncopole, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31059, Toulouse Cedex 9, France.
Pascale GrosclaudeInserm U1027, Faculty of Medicine, 37 allées Jules Guesde, 31073, Toulouse, France.
Hôpital Rangueil · FRInstitut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole · FRNational Cancer Registry · IEUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe primary care physician (PCP) is central to cancer patients' management. Announcement of the diagnosis is a critical time for patients, even if they wish to be fully informed. The French National Cancer Plan, developed 10 years ago, includes a diagnosis disclosure procedure (DDP) to be used by oncologists, which makes specific provision for a time of communication with PCPs. So, we asked PCPs about their role in cancer announcement since the launching of the DDP.

methodsA cross-sectional prospective study by postal questionnaire was sent to 500 PCPs in the largest region of France. It addressed (1) the characteristics of cancer disclosure, (2) PCPs' source of information of the diagnosis, (3) time of disclosure, (4) information exchange, and (5) the physicians' knowledge of the DDP.

resultsThe response rate was 48 %. In 20 % of cases, oncologists delegated the announcement to PCPs. In 19 % of cases, it was the patient or their family who informed the PCP of the diagnosis. We identified three announcement phases of cancer diagnosis in the physicians' clinical practice: pre-disclosure, disclosure, and repeat disclosure. In 57 % of cases, PCPs lacked information on prognosis and in 60 % on treatment. Regarding the DDP, nearly half of PCPs did not know the procedure itself or its content.

conclusionPCPs announce the cancer diagnosis, even if they have not received the necessary information to do so. The DDP needs to be adapted for use in primary care practice.

Indexed as

DisclosureAdultAgedCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOncologistsPatient Care PlanningPhysicians, Primary CareProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAnnouncementCancerDiagnosis disclosure procedureDisclosureGeneral practiceNational Cancer Plan

Identifiers

PMID26667626
OpenAlexW2199249126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.