Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26667625›Full record

ArticleMusculoskeletal surgery2016

How evolution of the nailing system improves results and reduces orthopedic complications: more than 2000 cases of trochanteric fractures treated with the Gamma Nail System.

R Pascarella, R Fantasia, A Maresca, C Bettuzzi, L Amendola, S Violini, F Cuoghi, P Sangiovanni, S Cerbasi, S Boriani and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Locking in trochanteric fractures: a comparison of static versus dynamic locking using the Gamma3 nail.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

R PascarellaOspedali Riuniti , Ancona, Italy. raffaele.pascarella@libero.it.
R FantasiaOspedali Riuniti , Ancona, Italy.
A MarescaOspedali Riuniti , Ancona, Italy.
C BettuzziOspedali Riuniti , Ancona, Italy.
L AmendolaOspedali Riuniti , Ancona, Italy.
S VioliniOspedali Riuniti , Ancona, Italy.
F CuoghiOspedali Riuniti , Ancona, Italy.
P SangiovanniOspedali Riuniti , Ancona, Italy.
S CerbasiOspedali Riuniti , Ancona, Italy.
S BorianiOspedali Riuniti , Ancona, Italy.
D S TiganiOspedali Riuniti , Ancona, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti · ITOspedale Maggiore Carlo Alberto Pizzardi · ITIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe incidence of trochanteric fractures has increased significantly during the last few decades, especially in elderly patients with osteoporosis. The dynamic/sliding hip screw and the cephalomedullary nail are the most commonly used fixation methods to treat trochanteric fractures. The improvements in the Gamma Nail System (GNS) associated with a correct surgical technique reduced the postoperative orthopedic complications. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of the different Gamma Nails.

methodsThe present study is a retrospective analysis of 2144 patients treated with GNS between January 1997 and December 2011 for trochanteric fractures, classified according to AO classification method. The patients were divided into three groups according to the nailing system: 525 were treated with Standard Gamma Nail (SGN), 422 with Trochanteric Gamma Nail (TGN) and 1197 with Gamma3 Nail.

resultsThe overall incidence of intra-operative complications was 1.21 %; the incidence of intra-operative complications for each group was 1.71 % for SGN group, 0.47 % for TGN group and 1.25 % for Gamma3 Nail group. The overall incidence of postoperative complications was 5.48 %, and the incidence for each group was 10.73 % for SGN group, 9.92 % for TGN group and 2.92 % for Gamma3 Nail group.

conclusionThe GNS is a safe device with a low rate of intra-operative complications. The evolution of this nail system reduces postoperative complications, thus improving the results at follow-up and confirming that the Gamma3 Nail is a safe and predictable device to fix trochanteric fracture.

Indexed as

Bone NailsBone ScrewsFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHip FracturesHumansRetrospective StudiesCutoutGamma Nail SystemNailPertrochanteric fracturesTrochanteric

Identifiers

PMID26667625
OpenAlexW2226011510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.