Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26667606›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of public health2016

A Transdisciplinary Approach to Public Health Law: The Emerging Practice of Legal Epidemiology.

Scott Burris, Marice Ashe, Donna Levin, Matthew Penn, Michelle Larkin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Scott BurrisNational Program Office, Public Health Law Research Program, Beasley School of Law, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122; email: scott.burris@temple.edu.
Marice AsheChangeLab Solutions, Oakland, California 94612; email: mashe@changelabsolutions.org.
Donna LevinNetwork for Public Health Law, St. Paul, Minnesota 55105; email: dlevin@networkforphl.org.
Matthew PennCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333; email: itv1@cdc.gov.
Michelle LarkinRobert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, New Jersey 08543; email: mlarkin@rwjf.org.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USChangeLab Solutions · USNational Health Law Program · USRobert Wood Johnson Foundation · USTemple University · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999OSTLTS CDC HHS CDC-RFA-OT13-1302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health law has roots in both law and science. For more than a century, lawyers have helped develop and implement health laws; over the past 50 years, scientific evaluation of the health effects of laws and legal practices has achieved high levels of rigor and influence. We describe an emerging model of public health law that unites these two traditions. This transdisciplinary model adds scientific practices to the lawyerly functions of normative and doctrinal research, counseling, and representation. These practices include policy surveillance and empirical public health law research on the efficacy of legal interventions and the impact of laws and legal practices on health and health system operation. A transdisciplinary model of public health law, melding its legal and scientific facets, can help break down enduring cultural, disciplinary, and resource barriers that have prevented the full recognition and optimal role of law in public health.

Indexed as

Interdisciplinary CommunicationCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.EpidemiologyHumansLegislation as TopicPolicyPublic HealthUnited Stateslegal epidemiologypolicy surveillancepublic health lawpublic health law researchpublic health practice

Identifiers

PMID26667606
PMCPMC5703193
OpenAlexW1921221872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.