Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26667449›Full record

Trial reportCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2016

Double-Blind, Randomized Trial of Alternative Letrozole Dosing Regimens in Postmenopausal Women with Increased Breast Cancer Risk.

Ana Maria López, Sandhya Pruthi, Judy C Boughey, Marjorie Perloff, Chiu-Hsieh Hsu, Julie E Lang, Michele Ley, Denise Frank, Josephine A Taverna, H-H Sherry Chow

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Maria LópezDepartment of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Sandhya PruthiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota.
Judy C BougheyDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota.
Marjorie PerloffDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland.
Chiu-Hsieh HsuUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Julie E LangDepartment of Surgery, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Michele LeyUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Denise FrankUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Josephine A TavernaUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
H-H Sherry ChowUniversity of Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona. schow@email.arizona.edu.
University of Arizona · USMayo Clinic · USHuntsman Cancer Institute · USNational Cancer Institute · MYUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI AKHILESH PANDEY · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
VITAMIN AP30CA023074 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Teri L Bankhead · 1985 to 2026
$110.2M
Cancer Prevention and Control Translational ResearchR25CA078447 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI ALBERTS, DAVID SAMUEL · 1998 to 2014
$7.6M
PHASE I AND II CLINICAL TRIALS OF CANCER CHEMOPREVENTIVE AGENTS-261035-261035158N01CN035158 · CN · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI ALBERTS, DAVID S · 2004 to 2006
–
COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035158 · NCI · ARKANSAS ONCOLOGY CLINIC · PI TRANUM, BILLY L · 1985 to 1986
–
NCI NIH HHS CA023074NCI NIH HHS N01 CN035158NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023074NCI NIH HHS R25 CA078447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aromatase inhibitors (AI) profoundly suppress estrogen levels in postmenopausal women and are effective in breast cancer prevention among high-risk postmenopausal women. Unfortunately, AI treatment is associated with undesirable side effects that limit patient acceptance for primary prevention of breast cancer. A double-blind, randomized trial was conducted to determine whether low and intermittent doses of letrozole can achieve effective estrogen suppression with a more favorable side-effect profile. Overall, 112 postmenopausal women at increased risk for breast cancer were randomized to receive letrozole at 2.5 mg once daily (QD, standard dose arm), 2.5 mg every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday (Q-MWF), 1.0 mg Q-MWF, or 0.25 mg Q-MWF for 24 weeks. Primary endpoint was suppression in serum estradiol levels at the end of letrozole intervention. Secondary endpoints included changes in serum estrone, testosterone, C-telopeptide (marker of bone resorption), lipid profile, and quality-of-life measures (QoL) following treatment. Significant estrogen suppression was observed in all dose arms with an average of 75% to 78% and 86% to 93% reduction in serum estradiol and estrone levels, respectively. There were no differences among dose arms with respect to changes in C-telopeptide levels, lipid profile, adverse events (AE), or QoL measures. We conclude that low and intermittent doses of letrozole are not inferior to standard dose in estrogen suppression and resulted in a similar side-effect profile compared with standard dose. Further studies are needed to determine the feasibility of selecting an effective AI dosing schedule with better tolerability.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma in SituCarcinoma, LobularDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLetrozoleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingNitrilesPostmenopausePrognosisTriazolesAntineoplastic AgentsLetrozoleNitrilesTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID26667449
PMCPMC4740217
OpenAlexW2214993173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.