Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26667374›Full record

ReviewGenes, brain, and behavior2016

Modeling neurodevelopmental cognitive deficits in tasks with cross-species translational validity.

Z A Cope, S B Powell, J W Young

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, brain, and behavior, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Developmental Manipulation-Induced Changes in Cognitive Functioning.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Animal models for bipolar disorder: from bedside to the cage.International journal of bipolar disorders · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Z A CopeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla.
S B PowellDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla.
J W YoungDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla.
University of California, San Diego · USVA San Diego Healthcare System · US

Funding

Fellowship on Biological Psychiatry and NeuroscienceT32MH018399 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Pei-an (Betty) Shih · 1986 to 2026
$7.3M
Sensitive and Treatable Periods of Brain-Redox Imbalance in SchizophreniaR01MH091407 · NIMH · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI BEHRENS, M MARGARITA, POWELL, SUSAN B · 2010 to 2014
$2.1M
A model organism of brain circuitry and behavioral switching for bipolar disorderR01MH104344 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI YOUNG, JARED WILLIAM · 2014 to 2017
$1.7M
Neurophysiological biomarkers of behavioral dimensions from cross-species paradigmsUH2MH109168 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI YOUNG, JARED WILLIAM · 2016 to 2017
$993k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH091407NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH091407NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104344NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH104344NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH018399NIMH NIH HHS UH2 MH109168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous psychiatric disorders whose cognitive dysfunction links to functional outcome have neurodevelopmental origins including schizophrenia, autism and bipolar disorder. Treatments are needed for these cognitive deficits, which require development using animal models. Models of neurodevelopmental disorders are as varied and diverse as the disorders themselves, recreating some but not all aspects of the disorder. This variety may in part underlie why purported procognitive treatments translated from these models have failed to restore functioning in the targeted patient populations. Further complications arise from environmental factors used in these models that can contribute to numerous disorders, perhaps only impacting specific domains, while diagnostic boundaries define individual disorders, limiting translational efficacy. The Research Domain Criteria project seeks to 'develop new ways to classify mental disorders based on behavioral dimensions and neurobiological measures' in hopes of facilitating translational research by remaining agnostic toward diagnostic borders derived from clinical presentation in humans. Models could therefore recreate biosignatures of cognitive dysfunction irrespective of disease state. This review highlights work within the field of neurodevelopmental models of psychiatric disorders tested in cross-species translational cognitive paradigms that directly inform this newly developing research strategy. By expounding on this approach, the hopes are that a fuller understanding of each model may be attainable in terms of the cognitive profile elicited by each manipulation. Hence, conclusions may begin to be drawn on the nature of cognitive neuropathology on neurodevelopmental and other disorders, increasing the chances of procognitive treatment development for individuals affected in specific cognitive domains.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalGene-Environment InteractionAnimalsCognition DisordersDevelopmental DisabilitiesHumansNeurogenesisSpecies SpecificityCNTRICScognitioncross-speciesdevelopmentalmicemotivationratsResearch Domain Criteriatranslational

Identifiers

PMID26667374
PMCPMC4961087
OpenAlexW2200312577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.