Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26667248›Full record

ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2016

Psychiatrists' Comfort Using Computers and Other Electronic Devices in Clinical Practice.

Farifteh F Duffy, Laura J Fochtmann, Diana E Clarke, Keila Barber, Seung-Hee Hong, Joel Yager, Eve K Mościcki, Robert M Plovnick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Farifteh F DuffyPractice Research Network, American Psychiatric Association Foundation, 1000 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1825, Arlington, VA, 22209, USA. fduffy@psych.org.
Laura J FochtmannDepartments of Psychiatry, Pharmacological Sciences and Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Diana E ClarkePractice Research Network, American Psychiatric Association Foundation, 1000 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1825, Arlington, VA, 22209, USA.
Keila BarberPractice Research Network, American Psychiatric Association Foundation, 1000 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1825, Arlington, VA, 22209, USA.
Seung-Hee HongQuality Improvement and Psychiatric Services, American Psychiatric Association, 1000 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA, 22209, USA.
Joel YagerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
Eve K MościckiPractice Research Network, American Psychiatric Association Foundation, 1000 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1825, Arlington, VA, 22209, USA.
Robert M PlovnickQuality Improvement Programs Department, American Society of Hematology, 2021 L Street NW, Suite 900, Washington, DC, 20036, USA.

Funding

Using Medical Informatics Principles to Enhance Development and Dissemination ofG08LM010710 · NLM · AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOC FOUNDATION · PI DUFFY, FARIFTEH F. · 2010 to 2012
$430k
NLM NIH HHS G08 LM010710
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report highlights findings from the Study of Psychiatrists' Use of Informational Resources in Clinical Practice, a cross-sectional Web- and paper-based survey that examined psychiatrists' comfort using computers and other electronic devices in clinical practice. One-thousand psychiatrists were randomly selected from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile and asked to complete the survey between May and August, 2012. A total of 152 eligible psychiatrists completed the questionnaire (response rate 22.2 %). The majority of psychiatrists reported comfort using computers for educational and personal purposes. However, 26 % of psychiatrists reported not using or not being comfortable using computers for clinical functions. Psychiatrists under age 50 were more likely to report comfort using computers for all purposes than their older counterparts. Clinical tasks for which computers were reportedly used comfortably, specifically by psychiatrists younger than 50, included documenting clinical encounters, prescribing, ordering laboratory tests, accessing read-only patient information (e.g., test results), conducting internet searches for general clinical information, accessing online patient educational materials, and communicating with patients or other clinicians. Psychiatrists generally reported comfort using computers for personal and educational purposes. However, use of computers in clinical care was less common, particularly among psychiatrists 50 and older. Information and educational resources need to be available in a variety of accessible, user-friendly, computer and non-computer-based formats, to support use across all ages. Moreover, ongoing training and technical assistance with use of electronic and mobile device technologies in clinical practice is needed. Research on barriers to clinical use of computers is warranted.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to ComputersInternetPsychiatryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBiomedical TechnologyComputersCross-Sectional StudiesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedClinical practiceComputer useEHRHealth care technologyPsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID26667248
PMCPMC4907880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.