Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26667057›Full record

ArticleAmbio2016

From first generation biofuels to advanced solar biofuels.

Eva-Mari Aro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Methanol as a co-substrate with COApplied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Heterologous Lactate Synthesis inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Nitrogen, phosphorus and high COPhotosynthesis research · 2021
    Article
  12. Simultaneous FeACS omega · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Eva-Mari AroDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Plant Biology, University of Turku, 20014, Turku, Finland. evaaro@utu.fi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Roadmaps towards sustainable bioeconomy, including the production of biofuels, in many EU countries mostly rely on biomass use. However, although biomass is renewable, the efficiency of biomass production is too low to be able to fully replace the fossil fuels. The use of land for fuel production also introduces ethical problems in increasing the food price. Harvesting solar energy by the photosynthetic machinery of plants and autotrophic microorganisms is the basis for all biomass production. This paper describes current challenges and possibilities to sustainably increase the biomass production and highlights future technologies to further enhance biofuel production directly from sunlight. The biggest scientific breakthroughs are expected to rely on a new technology called "synthetic biology", which makes engineering of biological systems possible. It will enable direct conversion of solar energy to a fuel from inexhaustible raw materials: sun light, water and CO2. In the future, such solar biofuels are expected to be produced in engineered photosynthetic microorganisms or in completely synthetic living factories.

Indexed as

BiomassSolar EnergyBiofuelsSunlightSynthetic BiologyBiofuelsAdvanced biofuelBiomassPhotosynthesisPhotosynthetic microorganismSolarfuelSynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID26667057
PMCPMC4678123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.