Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26667009›Full record

ReviewBiogerontology2016

Age-dependent motor unit remodelling in human limb muscles.

Mathew Piasecki, Alex Ireland, David A Jones, Jamie S McPhee

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biogerontology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05060497 (DYNamic Assessment of Multi Organ Level Dysfunction in Patients Recovering From Covid-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 110 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05060497 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

DYNamic Assessment of Multi Organ Level Dysfunction in Patients Recovering From Covid-19

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of NottinghamRan2020 to 2022Enrolled31ConditionsCovid19
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 168 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mathew PiaseckiSchool of Healthcare Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M15GD, UK.
Alex IrelandSchool of Healthcare Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M15GD, UK.
David A JonesSchool of Healthcare Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M15GD, UK.
Jamie S McPheeSchool of Healthcare Science, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M15GD, UK. j.s.mcphee@mmu.ac.uk.
Manchester Metropolitan University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K025252/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voluntary control of skeletal muscle enables humans to interact with and manipulate the environment. Lower muscle mass, weakness and poor coordination are common complaints in older age and reduce physical capabilities. Attention has focused on ways of maintaining muscle size and strength by exercise, diet or hormone replacement. Without appropriate neural innervation, however, muscle cannot function. Emerging evidence points to a neural basis of muscle loss. Motor unit number estimates indicate that by age around 71 years, healthy older people have around 40 % fewer motor units. The surviving low- and moderate-threshold motor units recruited for moderate intensity contractions are enlarged by around 50 % and show increased fibre density, presumably due to collateral reinnervation of denervated fibres. Motor unit potentials show increased complexity and the stability of neuromuscular junction transmissions is decreased. The available evidence is limited by a lack of longitudinal studies, relatively small sample sizes, a tendency to examine the small peripheral muscles and relatively few investigations into the consequences of motor unit remodelling for muscle size and control of movements in older age. Loss of motor neurons and remodelling of surviving motor units constitutes the major change in ageing muscles and probably contributes to muscle loss and functional impairments. The deterioration and remodelling of motor units likely imposes constraints on the way in which the central nervous system controls movements.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAgingEvidence-Based MedicineExtremitiesFemaleHumansMaleModels, BiologicalMotor NeuronsMuscle ContractionMuscle Fibers, SkeletalMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthSarcopeniaAgeingMotor neuronMotor unitMuscleSarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID26667009
PMCPMC4889636
OpenAlexW2220447049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.