ReviewHNO2016
[Recent developments in the diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea].
Review in HNO, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past years, the diagnostic tools and therapeutic approaches for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have further evolved. Based on a review of current literature and the personal experiences of the authors, the most relevant developments are summarized in this article and discussed with regard to their impact on the clinical management of this disease. In the third edition of the "International Classification of Sleep Disorders", the classification of sleep-disordered breathing was modified. Notably, additional clinical criteria for the diagnosis of OSA were established and out-of-center sleep testing was introduced as an alternative to polysomnography. Recent technical advancement of new diagnostic tools (e.g., peripheral arterial tonometry and pulse wave analysis) has further expanded the diagnostic possibilities. Drug-induced sleep endoscopy enables reliable assessment of the level and degree of upper airway obstruction. Whether this gain in diagnostic information leads to an improvement in surgical outcome is, however, still under discussion. The relevance of positional OSA has received increasing attention-the proportion of patients in whom sleeping position significantly impacts disease is reported to be above 50%. For these patients, the introduction of the sleep position trainer has made a new therapeutic option available. Furthermore, hypoglossal nerve stimulation (upper airway stimulation) has substantially expanded the surgical spectrum of OSA treatment. For the established surgical treatment options, randomized trials with superior methodology have been published, particularly for bimaxillary advancement and tonsillectomy with uvulopalatopharyngoplasty. These developments are of particular interest for the otolaryngologist and will influence daily practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.