Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26666521›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2017

"We Always Think You're Here Permanently": The Paradox of "Permanent" Housing and Other Barriers to Recovery-Oriented Practice in Supportive Housing Services.

Emmy Tiderington

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Emmy TideringtonRutgers School of Social Work, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 360 Dr. Martin Luther King Blvd., Hill Hall, Suite 401A, Newark, NJ, 07102-1801, USA. emmy.tiderington@rutgers.edu.

Funding

Qualitative Study of Mental Health Recovery in Dual Diagnosed HomelessR01MH084903 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI PADGETT, DEBORAH KAY · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
Identifying Barriers to Recovery-Oriented Practice in Supportive Housing ServicesF31MH100772 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI TIDERINGTON, EMMY · 2013 to 2014
$85k
NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH100772NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH084903
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This qualitative study examines the views and practices of frontline providers working in supportive housing for adults with serious mental illness and how frontline workers understand their work as it relates to consumer mental health recovery. Utilizing 84 interviews with providers (N = 35) and 106 hours of observation of provider practice, a grounded theory of frontline practice in supportive housing is provided. Analyses revealed distinct differences between providers working within transitional versus permanent housing programs in their orientation to recovery. Implications for the design of the supportive housing continuum of care are discussed.

Indexed as

HousingCase ManagementFemaleHumansIll-Housed PersonsInterviews as TopicMaleMental DisordersQualitative ResearchCase managementMental health recoveryQualitativeSupportive housing

Identifiers

PMID26666521
PMCPMC4907886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.