Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26666423›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2016

Implementation of Enhanced Recovery (ERAS) in Colorectal Surgery Has a Positive Impact on Non-ERAS Liver Surgery Patients.

Ismail Labgaa, Ghada Jarrar, Gaëtan-Romain Joliat, Pierre Allemann, Sylvain Gander, Catherine Blanc, Martin Hübner, Nicolas Demartines

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Reduces Hospital Costs and Improve Clinical Outcomes in Liver Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Programs for Liver Resection: a Meta-analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ismail LabgaaDepartment of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Ghada JarrarDepartment of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Gaëtan-Romain JoliatDepartment of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Pierre AllemannDepartment of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Sylvain GanderDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hospital of Yverdon-Les-Bains, Yverdon-Les-Bains, Switzerland.
Catherine BlancDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Martin HübnerDepartment of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nicolas DemartinesDepartment of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Lausanne (CHUV), 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. demartines@chuv.ch.
University Hospital of Lausanne · CHY-Parc (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) reduces complications and hospital stay in colorectal surgery. Thereafter, ERAS principles were extended to liver surgery. Previous implementation of an ERAS program in colorectal surgery may influence patients undergoing liver surgery in a non-ERAS setting, on the same ward. This study aimed to test this hypothesis.

methodsRetrospective analysis based on prospective data of the adherence to the institutional ERAS-liver protocol (compliance) in three cohorts of consecutive patients undergoing elective liver surgery, between June 2010 and July 2014: before any ERAS implementation (pre-ERAS n = 50), after implementation of ERAS in colorectal (intermediate n = 50), and after implementation of ERAS in liver surgery (ERAS-liver n = 74). Outcomes were functional recovery, postoperative complications, hospital stay, and readmissions.

resultsThe three groups were comparable for demographics; laparoscopy was more frequent in ERAS-liver (p = 0.009). Compliance with the enhanced recovery protocol increased along the three periods (pre-ERAS, intermediate, and ERAS-liver), regardless of the perioperative phase (pre-, intra-, or postoperative). ERAS-liver group displayed the highest overall compliance rate with 73.8 %, compared to 39.9 and 57.4 % for pre-ERAS and intermediate groups (p = 0.072/0.056). Overall complications were unchanged (p = 0.185), whereas intermediate and ERAS-liver groups showed decreased major complications (p = 0.034). Consistently, hospital stay was reduced by 2 days (p = 0.005) without increased readmissions (p = 0.158).

conclusionsThe previous implementation of an ERAS protocol in colorectal surgery may induce a positive impact on patients undergoing non-ERAS-liver surgery on the same ward. These results suggest that ERAS is safely applicable in liver surgery and associated with benefits.

Indexed as

AgedClinical ProtocolsFemaleHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayLiverMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionPerioperative CarePostoperative ComplicationsPractice Guidelines as TopicProgram EvaluationRetrospective StudiesSwitzerland

Identifiers

PMID26666423
OpenAlexW2205460068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.