ArticleBeilstein journal of nanotechnology2015
An ISA-TAB-Nano based data collection framework to support data-driven modelling of nanotoxicology.
Article in Beilstein journal of nanotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Do We Know Enough About the Safety Profile of Silver Nanoparticles in Oncology? A Focus on Novel Methods and Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- FAIR assessment of nanosafety data reusability with community standards.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Translating nanoEHS data using EPA NaKnowBase and the resource description framework.F1000Research · 2024Article
- FAIRification of nanosafety data to improve applicability of (Q)SAR approaches: A case study onComputational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021Article
- Nano-bio surface interactions, cellular internalisation in cancer cells and e-data portals of nanomaterials: A review.IET nanobiotechnology · 2021Review
- Effect of the Albumin Corona on the Toxicity of Combined Graphene Oxide and Cadmium toNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Your Spreadsheets Can Be FAIR: A Tool and FAIRification Workflow for the eNanoMapper Database.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Integration among databases and data sets to support productive nanotechnology: Challenges and recommendations.NanoImpact · 2018Article
- An Integrated Data-Driven Strategy for Safe-by-Design Nanoparticles: The FP7 MODERN Project.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2017Review
- Compilation of Data and Modelling of Nanoparticle Interactions and Toxicity in the NanoPUZZLES Project.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2017Review
- Provenance information as a tool for addressing engineered nanoparticle reproducibility challenges.Biointerphases · 2016Article
- Article
- Experiences in supporting the structured collection of cancer nanotechnology data using caNanoLab.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2015Article
- Nanoinformatics for environmental health and biomedicine.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Analysis of trends in nanotoxicology data and the development of data driven models for nanotoxicity is facilitated by the reporting of data using a standardised electronic format. ISA-TAB-Nano has been proposed as such a format. However, in order to build useful datasets according to this format, a variety of issues has to be addressed. These issues include questions regarding exactly which (meta)data to report and how to report them. The current article discusses some of the challenges associated with the use of ISA-TAB-Nano and presents a set of resources designed to facilitate the manual creation of ISA-TAB-Nano datasets from the nanotoxicology literature. These resources were developed within the context of the NanoPUZZLES EU project and include data collection templates, corresponding business rules that extend the generic ISA-TAB-Nano specification as well as Python code to facilitate parsing and integration of these datasets within other nanoinformatics resources. The use of these resources is illustrated by a "Toy Dataset" presented in the Supporting Information. The strengths and weaknesses of the resources are discussed along with possible future developments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.