Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26665040›Full record

ReviewGlobal advances in health and medicine2015

Biofield Physiology: A Framework for an Emerging Discipline.

Richard Hammerschlag, Michael Levin, Rollin McCraty, Namuun Bat, John A Ives, Susan K Lutgendorf, James L Oschman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global advances in health and medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Biofield Therapies: Guidelines for Reporting Clinical Trials.Journal of integrative and complementary medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Biofield Therapies: Guidelines for Reporting Clinical Trials.Global advances in integrative medicine and health
    Article
  12. Perception of Subtle Energy "Global advances in integrative medicine and health
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Richard HammerschlagThe Institute for Integrative Health, Baltimore, Maryland; Consciousness and Healing Initiative, San Diego, California; Oregon College of Oriental Medicine, Portland (Dr Hammerschlag).
Michael LevinTufts Center for Regenerative and Developmental Biology, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts (Dr Levin).
Rollin McCratyInstitute of HeartMath, Boulder Creek, California (Dr McCraty).
Namuun BatThe Center for Brain, Mind, and Healing, Samueli Institute, Alexandria, Virginia (Ms Bat).
John A IvesThe Center for Brain, Mind, and Healing, Samueli Institute, Alexandria, Virginia (Dr Ives).
Susan K LutgendorfDepartments of Psychology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City (Dr Lutgendorf).
James L OschmanNature's Own Research Association, Dover, New Hampshire (Dr Oschman).
Samueli Institute · USHeartMath Institute · USOregon College of Oriental Medicine · USTufts University · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofield physiology is proposed as an overarching descriptor for the electromagnetic, biophotonic, and other types of spatially-distributed fields that living systems generate and respond to as integral aspects of cellular, tissue, and whole organism self-regulation and organization. Medical physiology, cell biology, and biophysics provide the framework within which evidence for biofields, their proposed receptors, and functions is presented. As such, biofields can be viewed as affecting physiological regulatory systems in a manner that complements the more familiar molecular-based mechanisms. Examples of clinically relevant biofields are the electrical and magnetic fields generated by arrays of heart cells and neurons that are detected, respectively, as electrocardiograms (ECGs) or magnetocardiograms (MCGs) and electroencephalograms (EEGs) or magnetoencephalograms (MEGs). At a basic physiology level, electromagnetic activity of neural assemblies appears to modulate neuronal synchronization and circadian rhythmicity. Numerous nonneural electrical fields have been detected and analyzed, including those arising from patterns of resting membrane potentials that guide development and regeneration, and from slowly-varying transepithelial direct current fields that initiate cellular responses to tissue damage. Another biofield phenomenon is the coherent, ultraweak photon emissions (UPE), detected from cell cultures and from the body surface. A physiological role for biophotons is consistent with observations that fluctuations in UPE correlate with cerebral blood flow, cerebral energy metabolism, and EEG activity. Biofield receptors are reviewed in 3 categories: molecular-level receptors, charge flux sites, and endogenously generated electric or electromagnetic fields. In summary, sufficient evidence has accrued to consider biofield physiology as a viable scientific discipline. Directions for future research are proposed.

Indexed as

Biofieldbiofield physiologybiophotonselectromagnetic fieldsphysiological regulation

Identifiers

PMID26665040
PMCPMC4654783
OpenAlexW2172375368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.