Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26664988›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2015

Salmonella enterica Serovars Enteritidis Infection Alters the Indigenous Microbiota Diversity in Young Layer Chicks.

Khin K Z Mon, Perot Saelao, Michelle M Halstead, Ganrea Chanthavixay, Huai-Chen Chang, Lydia Garas, Elizabeth A Maga, Huaijun Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. AApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effects ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. A live attenuatedFrontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Modulation of Caecal Microbiota and Metabolome Profile inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Khin K Z MonDepartment of Animal Science, University of California Davis , Davis, CA , USA.
Perot SaelaoDepartment of Animal Science, University of California Davis , Davis, CA , USA.
Michelle M HalsteadDepartment of Animal Science, University of California Davis , Davis, CA , USA.
Ganrea ChanthavixayDepartment of Animal Science, University of California Davis , Davis, CA , USA.
Huai-Chen ChangDepartment of Animal Science, University of California Davis , Davis, CA , USA.
Lydia GarasDepartment of Animal Science, University of California Davis , Davis, CA , USA.
Elizabeth A MagaDepartment of Animal Science, University of California Davis , Davis, CA , USA.
Huaijun ZhouDepartment of Animal Science, University of California Davis , Davis, CA , USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Avian gastrointestinal (GI) tracts are highly populated with a diverse array of microorganisms that share a symbiotic relationship with their hosts and contribute to the overall health and disease state of the intestinal tract. The microbiome of the young chick is easily prone to alteration in its composition by both exogenous and endogenous factors, especially during the early posthatch period. The genetic background of the host and exposure to pathogens can impact the diversity of the microbial profile that consequently contributes to the disease progression in the host. The objective of this study was to profile the composition and structure of the gut microbiota in young chickens from two genetically distinct highly inbred lines. Furthermore, the effect of the Salmonella Enteritidis infection on altering the composition makeup of the chicken microbiome was evaluated through the 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis. One-day-old layer chicks were challenged with S. Enteritidis and the host cecal microbiota profile as well as the degree of susceptibility to Salmonella infection was examined at 2 and 7 days post infection. Our result indicated that host genotype had a limited effect on resistance to S. Enteritidis infection. Alpha diversity, beta diversity, and overall microbiota composition were analyzed for four factors: host genotype, age, treatment, and postinfection time points. S. Enteritidis infection in young chicks was found to significantly reduce the overall diversity of the microbiota population with expansion of Enterobacteriaceae family. These changes indicated that Salmonella colonization in the GI tract of the chickens has a direct effect on altering the natural development of the GI microbiota. The impact of S. Enteritidis infection on microbial communities was also more substantial in the late stage of infection. Significant inverse correlation between Enterobacteriaceae and Lachnospiraceae family in both non-infected and infected groups, suggested possible antagonistic interaction between members of these two taxa, which could potentially influences the overall microbial population in the gut. Our results also revealed that genetic difference between two lines had minimal effect on the establishment of microbiota population. Overall, this study provided preliminary insights into the contributing role of S. Enteritidis in influencing the overall makeup of chicken's gut microbiota.

Indexed as

16S rRNAchickensgut microbiotaMHC haplotypesSalmonella Enteritidis

Identifiers

PMID26664988
PMCPMC4672283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.