Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26664926›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2014

The Wild Side of Disease Control at the Wildlife-Livestock-Human Interface: A Review.

Christian Gortazar, Iratxe Diez-Delgado, Jose Angel Barasona, Joaquin Vicente, Jose De La Fuente, Mariana Boadella

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular detection of shared pathogens in red foxes (One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Frontiers in public health · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. The effectiveness of harvest for limiting wildlife disease: Insights from 20 years of chronic wasting disease in Wyoming.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christian GortazarSaBio (Health and Biotechnology), IREC (CSIC - UCLM - JCCM) , Ciudad Real , Spain.
Iratxe Diez-DelgadoSaBio (Health and Biotechnology), IREC (CSIC - UCLM - JCCM) , Ciudad Real , Spain ; Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid , Madrid , Spain.
Jose Angel BarasonaSaBio (Health and Biotechnology), IREC (CSIC - UCLM - JCCM) , Ciudad Real , Spain.
Joaquin VicenteSaBio (Health and Biotechnology), IREC (CSIC - UCLM - JCCM) , Ciudad Real , Spain.
Jose De La FuenteSaBio (Health and Biotechnology), IREC (CSIC - UCLM - JCCM) , Ciudad Real , Spain ; Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Center for Veterinary Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University , Stillwater, OK , USA.
Mariana BoadellaSABIOtec Spin-Off, Edificio Polivalente UCLM , Ciudad Real , Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The control of diseases shared with wildlife requires the development of strategies that will reduce pathogen transmission between wildlife and both domestic animals and human beings. This review describes and criticizes the options currently applied and attempts to forecast wildlife disease control in the coming decades. Establishing a proper surveillance and monitoring scheme (disease and population wise) is the absolute priority before even making the decision as to whether or not to intervene. Disease control can be achieved by different means, including: (1) preventive actions, (2) arthropod vector control, (3) host population control through random or selective culling, habitat management or reproductive control, and (4) vaccination. The alternative options of zoning or no-action should also be considered, particularly in view of a cost/benefit assessment. Ideally, tools from several fields should be combined in an integrated control strategy. The success of disease control in wildlife depends on many factors, including disease ecology, natural history, and the characteristics of the pathogen, the availability of suitable diagnostic tools, the characteristics of the domestic and wildlife host(s) and vectors, the geographical spread of the problem, the scale of the control effort and stakeholders' attitudes.

Indexed as

monitoringpopulation controlshared infectionsvaccinationvector controlzoning

Identifiers

PMID26664926
PMCPMC4668863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.