Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26664788›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2015

Magnetic resonance brain imaging in patients with visual vertigo.

Lea Pollak, Michael Osherov, Nadav Berkovitz, Inessa Beckerman, Rafael Stryjer, Sigal Tal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Chronic dizziness: neuro-sensitization and psycho-sensitization.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A case-control study of visually evoked postural responses in childhood with primary headaches.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  11. Perceptual Postural Imbalance and Visual Vertigo.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lea PollakDepartment of Neurology The Assaf Harofeh Medical Center Zerifin Israel ; Affiliated to The Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel.
Michael OsherovDepartment of Neurology The Assaf Harofeh Medical Center Zerifin Israel ; Affiliated to The Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel.
Nadav BerkovitzAffiliated to The Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel ; Department of Radiology The Assaf Harofeh Medical Center Zerifin Israel.
Inessa BeckermanAffiliated to The Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel ; Department of Radiology The Assaf Harofeh Medical Center Zerifin Israel.
Rafael StryjerAffiliated to The Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel ; Public Health Hospital Beer Yaacov Israel.
Sigal TalAffiliated to The Sackler Faculty of Medicine Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel ; Department of Radiology The Assaf Harofeh Medical Center Zerifin Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with visual vertigo (VV) report dizziness provoked by moving visual surroundings. It has been suggested that these subjects develop a compensation strategy for a vestibulo-proprioceptive deficit and rely excessively on visual input. We have postulated that patients with VV might have brain abnormalities that interfere with appropriate processing of visual stimulation and performed a brain MRI study to verify this hypothesis. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with VV of more than 3 months duration were included. They were asked to complete the Situational Characteristic Questionnaire (SCQ) that scores for the symptoms of VV. Dizzy patients without VV served as controls. A brain MRI was performed with a Siemens 1.5 Tesla scanner in patients and controls.

resultsTwenty-four patients with VV were included. Their mean SCQ score was 1.45 ± 0.9 (normal 0.16 ± 0.28). In 50% of patients, abnormalities in MRI imaging were found. Thirty-three percent of 27 controls demonstrated an abnormal brain MRI. The two groups were similar in respect to the prevalence of a localized hemispheric or posterior fossa lesion (P = 0.13), but VV patients had more unspecific white matter brain changes than controls (P = 0.009). Patients and controls did not differ in age and gender distribution (P = 0.9) or the history of a neurotological event preceding their symptoms (P = 0.3).

conclusionsOur study suggests that multiple white matter lesions might contribute to occurrence of the phenomenon of VV. Future prospective large-scale studies by specific MR techniques are indicated to validate our preliminary findings and elucidate the pathological mechanism of VV.

Indexed as

AdultBrainCase-Control StudiesDizzinessFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingPhotic StimulationProspective StudiesVertigoWhite MatterDisabilityMRI findingsvisual vertigo

Identifiers

PMID26664788
PMCPMC4667762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.