ArticleClinical epigenetics2015
The integrative epigenomic-transcriptomic landscape of ER positive breast cancer.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Mapping Non-Coding Epimutations in Breast Cancer: Advancing Epigenetics Towards Precision Medicine.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2026Review
- Cell-type-specific subtyping of epigenomes improves prognostic stratification of cancer.Genome medicine · 2025Article
- Quantifying the stochastic component of epigenetic aging.Nature aging · 2024Article
- On epigenetic stochasticity, entropy and cancer risk.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Review
- Article
- Expression of the Immunohistochemical Markers CK5, CD117, and EGFR in Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer Correlated with Prognosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Multiomics insights on the onset, progression, and metastatic evolution of breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Circular RNA: A potential diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic biomarker for human triple-negative breast cancer.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2021Review
- Targeting DNA methylation for treating triple-negative breast cancer.Pharmacogenomics · 2019Article
- The molecular genetic make-up of male breast cancer.Endocrine-related cancer · 2019Article
- Methylation-Based Classification of Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma into Two New Subclasses Differing in Immune-Related Gene Expression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- Epigenetic alterations to Polycomb targets precede malignant transition in a mouse model of breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Integrating genome-wide DNA methylation and mRNA expression profiles identified different molecular features between Kashin-Beck disease and primary osteoarthritis.Arthritis research & therapy · 2018Article
- Statistical and integrative system-level analysis of DNA methylation data.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2018Review
- Long non-coding RNAs: implications in targeted diagnoses, prognosis, and improved therapeutic strategies in human non- and triple-negative breast cancer.Clinical epigenetics · 2018Review
- Article
- Erratum to: The integrative epigenomic-transcriptomic landscape of ER positive breast cancer.Clinical epigenetics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile recent integrative analyses of copy number and gene expression data in breast cancer have revealed a complex molecular landscape with multiple subtypes and many oncogenic/tumour suppressor driver events, much less is known about the role of DNA methylation in shaping breast cancer taxonomy and defining driver events.
resultsHere, we applied a powerful integrative network algorithm to matched DNA methylation and RNA-Seq data for 724 estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (ER+) breast cancers and 111 normal adjacent tissue specimens from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project, in order to identify putative epigenetic driver events and to explore the resulting molecular taxonomy. This revealed the existence of nine functionally deregulated epigenetic hotspots encompassing a total of 146 genes, which we were able to validate in independent data sets encompassing over 1000 ER+ breast cancers. Integrative clustering of the matched messenger RNA (mRNA) and DNA methylation data over these genes resulted in only two clusters, which correlated very strongly with the luminal-A and luminal B subtypes. Overall, luminal-A and luminal-B breast cancers shared the same epigenetically deregulated hotspots but with luminal-B cancers exhibiting increased aberrant DNA methylation patterns relative to normal tissue. We show that increased levels of DNA methylation and mRNA expression deviation from the normal state define a marker of poor prognosis. Our data further implicates epigenetic silencing of WNT signalling antagonists and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP) as key events underlying both luminal subtypes but specially of luminal-B breast cancer. Finally, we show that DNA methylation changes within the identified epigenetic interactome hotspots do not exhibit mutually exclusive patterns within the same cancer sample, instead exhibiting coordinated changes within the sample.
conclusionsOur results indicate that the integrative DNA methylation and transcriptomic landscape of ER+ breast cancer is surprisingly homogeneous, defining two main subtypes which strongly correlate with luminal-A/B subtype status. In particular, we identify WNT and BMP signalling as key epigenetically deregulated tumour suppressor pathways in luminal ER+ breast cancer, with increased deregulation seen in luminal-B breast cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.