Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26664469›Full record

ArticleJournal of medicine and life

Diagnostic yield of endoscopic markers for celiac disease.

D V Balaban, A Popp, F Vasilescu, D Haidautu, R M Purcarea, M Jinga

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medicine and life. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Non-Diarrheal Celiac Disease in Iraq: A Multicenter study.Middle East journal of digestive diseases · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Celiac Disease Revisited.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D V Balaban"Dr. Carol Davila" Central Military University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania ; "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
A Popp"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania ; "Alfred Rusescu" Institute for Mother and Child Care, Bucharest, Romania ; Tampere Center for Child Health Research, University of Tampere and Tampere University Hospital, Finland.
F Vasilescu"Dr. Carol Davila" Central Military University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
D Haidautu"Alfred Rusescu" Institute for Mother and Child Care, Bucharest, Romania.
R M Purcarea"Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
M Jinga"Dr. Carol Davila" Central Military University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania ; "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROInstitutul National pentru Sanatatea Mamei si Copilului "Alessandrescu-Rusescu" · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleIn the setting of open access endoscopy, the recognition of suggestive endoscopic features in the duodenum can select patients with probability of celiac disease (CD). This could add to the current efforts to increase the diagnostic rate of this disease.

aimThe aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of these markers for CD in an adult population undergoing endoscopy, without a prior serological testing. METHODS AND

resultsOver a period of 3 years, between June 2012 and 2015, all the patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and presented one or more of the endoscopic markers consistent with CD, or those suspected for CD, irrespective of the presence of these markers, were included. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated for these markers in CD diagnosis. Among the 182 patients, 56.04% were females, with a mean age of 47.6 ± 13.9 years. 20/182 (10.99%) had a final diagnosis of CD. The presence of any endoscopic marker had a high sensitivity (95%) and a negative predictive value (98.41%). Bulb atrophy and reduced folds in the descending duodenum had a low diagnostic accuracy, while scalloping, mosaic pattern and fissures were highly specific for CD (98.77%, 99.38% and 98.77%) and their presence greatly increased the probability of CD, with a positive likelihood ratio of 24.3, 24.3 and 12.15, respectively. DISCUSSIONS: A wide set of endoscopic markers, including the duodenal bulb, were evaluated in this study. Our results showed that the endoscopy with a careful examination of the duodenum is a sensitive indicator for CD. ABBREVIATIONS: CD = celiac disease, GI = gastrointestinal, VA = villous atrophy, NSAID = nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, Sn = sensitivity, Sp = specificity, PPV = positive predictive value, NPV = negative predictive value, AUC = area under the curve, ROC = receiver operating characteristics, WLE = white light endoscopy, NBI = narrow band imaging, tTG = tissue transglutaminase, EMA = anti-endomysial antibodies.

Indexed as

EndoscopyBiomarkersCeliac DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNarrow Band ImagingROC CurveBiomarkersceliacdiagnosisendoscopymarkers

Identifiers

PMID26664469
PMCPMC4656951
OpenAlexW2212723744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.