Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26664447›Full record

ArticleConflict and health2015

Psychological distress and its associations with past events in pregnant women affected by armed conflict in Swat, Pakistan: a cross sectional study.

Muhammad Naseem Khan, Anna Chiumento, Mukesh Dherani, Katie Bristow, Siham Sikander, Atif Rahman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conflict and health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03540927 (Impact of a Multicomponent Group Intervention on Psychosocial Well-being of Rehabilitated Entrepreneurs in a Conflict-affected Area of Pakistan), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03540927 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Impact of a Multicomponent Group Intervention on Psychosocial Well-being of Rehabilitated Entrepreneurs in a Conflict-affected Area of Pakistan: A Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHuman Development Research Foundation, PakistanRan2018 to 2019Enrolled235ConditionsWell-being, Psychological Capital, Anxiety, DepressionArmsPM+ for entrepreneurs, Cash transfer to the Entrepreneurs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Muhammad Naseem KhanInstitute of Public Health and Social Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Phase 5 Hayatabad, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Anna ChiumentoInstitute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Mukesh DheraniInstitute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Katie BristowInstitute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Siham SikanderHuman Development Research Foundation, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Atif RahmanInstitute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
University of Liverpool · GBHuman Development Research Foundation · PKKhyber Medical University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe public health significance of maternal mental health is well established. Armed conflicts expose populations to events that could have long-term negative consequences for mental health of pregnant women and their children. This study explores the prevalence and associated risk factors for psychological distress of women during pregnancy, including exposure to past conflict-related potentially traumatic events, in a population exposed to armed conflict in the Swat region of Pakistan.

methodsA community-based cross-sectional survey of 349 pregnant women in two union councils in Swat was conducted. Psychological distress was measured using the Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ). Conflict-related potentially traumatic events (PTEs) were measured through an adapted version of the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire. Information was also collected on major life events (Life Events Checklist), social support (Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support), and demographic and socio-economic variables.

resultsPrevalence of current psychological distress was 38.1 % (95 % CI: 33.1, 43.3). Psychological distress was significantly associated with three or more potentially traumatic events (PTEs) experienced during the conflict (OR = 2.62, 95 % CI: 1.22, 5.61); three or more major life events in the year following the conflict (OR = 3.25, 95 % CI: 1.82, 5.82) and inversely associated with family support (OR = 0.91, 95 % CI: 0.88, 0.95).

conclusionThis is one of the first community based cross sectional surveys in Swat valley, Pakistan to assess the prevalence of psychological distress during pregnancy in an area affected by conflict. Over a third of women show evidence of significant psychological distress. Exposure to potentially traumatic events remained independently associated with psychological distress 1 year after conflict ended, suggesting that conflict exposure may have long-term impacts upon maternal mental health. Combining this with findings relating to the cumulative impact of major life-events, and the protective factor of family support highlights the importance of developing culturally appropriate psychological interventions accessible to pregnant women rebuilding their lives following conflict.

Indexed as

ConflictDaily life stressorsMaternal healthMental healthPakistanPregnancyPsychological distressSocial supportTraumatic events

Identifiers

PMID26664447
PMCPMC4674905
OpenAlexW2231310300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.