Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26664430›Full record

ReviewJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences2015

Vascular endothelial growth factor -2578C/A polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis.

Lei Wang, Shan Ji, Zeneng Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lei WangInstitute of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Shan JiInstitute of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Zeneng ChengInstitute of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effects of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene -2578C/A polymorphism on colorectal cancer (CRC) risk have been investigated in some studies; however, the results of these studies were conflicting and ambiguous. Therefore, we aimed to do a meta-analysis to investigate the association of VEGF -2578C/A polymorphisms with CRC risk from all eligible case-control studies published to date. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn electronic search of the PubMed, Embase and Medline was performed. Retrieve terms were utilized as following: ("VEGF a" [MeSH Terms]) and ("polymorphism, genetic" [MeSH Terms]) and ("colorectal neoplasms" [MeSH Terms]). The association between VEGF -2578C/A polymorphisms with CRC risk was calculated with odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% of confidence intervals (CIs), and stratified analysis was also conducted with respect to ethnicity.

resultsA comprehensive meta-analysis of eight studies, including 2312 cases and 2308 controls was performed in this work. Combined analysis revealed that a significant association between the VEGF -2578C/A polymorphism with CRC risk was identified in three comparison models including C allele versus A allele (OR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.97, P = 0.02), AA versus CA + CC (OR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.09-1.51, P = 0.003), and AA versus CC (OR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.93, P = 0.006). Moreover, a similar result was obtained in the subgroup analysis that comparison models of C allele versus. A allele (OR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.76-0.95, P = 0.004), AA versus CA + CC (OR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.09-1.57, P = 0.004), and AA versus CC (OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.90, P = 0.004) was confirmed to be associated with CRC risk in Caucasian.

conclusionIt has been proved that the C allele versus A allele, AA versus CA + CC, and AA versus CC comparison models of VEGF -2578C/A polymorphism might be risk factors for CRC, but further studies with larger sample sizes are required to make a better assessment of above association.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancermeta-analysispolymorphismvascular endothelial growth factor

Identifiers

PMID26664430
PMCPMC4652316
OpenAlexW1831287620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.