Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26664422›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences2015

A clinical trial of neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by resection for esophageal carcinoma.

Kazem Anvari, Seyed Amir Aledavood, Mehdi Seilanian Toussi, Mohammad Naser Forghani, Samira Mohtashami, Mohammad Taghi Rajabi, Fatemeh Homaee Shandiz, Fatemeh Nosrati, Gholamhossein Nowferesti, Roham Salek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kazem AnvariCancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Seyed Amir AledavoodCancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mehdi Seilanian ToussiCancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mohammad Naser ForghaniCancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Samira MohtashamiCancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mohammad Taghi RajabiEndoscopic and Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Ghaem Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Fatemeh Homaee ShandizCancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Fatemeh NosratiOmid Hospital, Radiation Oncology Specialist, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Gholamhossein NowferestiCancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Roham SalekCancer Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophageal carcinoma is a common malignancy in the North East of Iran. Combined modality treatments have been adopted to improve survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma. In this trial, we evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of a preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy protocol in the patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. MATERIALS AND

methodsBetween 2006 and 2011, eligible patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma underwent concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy and 3-4 weeks later, esophagectomy. Pathologic response, overall survival rate, toxicity, and feasibility were evaluated.

resultsOne hundred ninety-seven patients with a median age of 59 (range: 27-70) entered the protocol. One hundred ninety-four cases (98.5%) had esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Grades 3-4 of toxicity in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradotherapy were as follows: Neutropenia in 21% and esophagitis in 2.5% of cases. There were 11 (5.6%) early death probably due to the treatment-related toxicities. One hundred twenty-seven patients underwent surgery with postsurgical mortality of 11%. In these cases, the complete pathological response was shown in 38 cases (29.9%) with a 5-year overall survival rates of 48.2% and median overall survival of 44 months (95% confidence interval, 24.46-63.54).

conclusionThe pathological response rate and the overall survival rate are promising in patients who completed the protocol as receiving at least one cycle of chemotherapy. However, the treatment toxicities were relatively high.

Indexed as

Esophageal carcinomaneoadjuvant chemoradiationsurvival

Identifiers

PMID26664422
PMCPMC4652308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.