ReviewClinics in colon and rectal surgery2015
Management of Malignant Adenomas.
Review in Clinics in colon and rectal surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of acylated/deacylated ghrelin, CCL20/CCR6 concentration, and IgG N-Glycan alterations in different dysplasia grades of colon adenoma.Glycoconjugate journal · 2026Article
- Association of distal adenoma and hyperplastic polyp characteristics with long-term proximal colon cancer risk: a secondary, observational analysis of data from the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Observational
- The Outcome of Local Excision of Rectal Adenomas with High-Grade Dysplasia by Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery: A Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Pre-malignant conditions diagnosed following a positive cancer signal from a multi-cancer early detection test.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Malignant colon polyps: predicting lymph node metastasis following endoscopic excision.International journal of colorectal disease · 2022Article
- Management Considerations for the Surgical Treatment of Colorectal Cancer During the Global Covid-19 Pandemic.Annals of surgery · 2020Article
- Quadruplicate Synchronous Adenocarcinoma of the Colon with Distant Metastases-Long-Term Molecular Follow-Up by KRAS and TP53 Mutational Profiling.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Importance of Resection Margins in the Treatment of Rectal Adenomas by Transanal Endoscopic Surgery.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019Article
- Factors predicting occurrence and therapeutic choice in malignant colorectal polyps: a study of 13 years of colonoscopic polypectomy.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most polyps that originate in the colon and rectum are benign. A small subset of polyps will contain a malignancy. Although most malignant adenomas are managed with colonic resection a number can be approached with endoscopic, minimally invasive, and observational techniques. This article reviews the histologic characteristics and adverse risk factors that would portend a poor oncologic outcome and therefore suggest formal colonic resection. Modern endoscopic techniques such as endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal resection are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.