ArticleQualitative research : QR2015
A qualitative method for analysing multivoicedness.
Article in Qualitative research : QR, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nurses' Challenges With Personal Protective Equipment: A Qualitative Content Analysis Based on the COVID-19 Pandemic.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
- Thinking Through Historical Analogies: A Longitudinal Analysis of Sense-Making During the Pandemic.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2025Article
- Exploring professional vision of vet students and tutors: noticing, evaluating and reasoning about practice.Vocations and learning · 2025Article
- Agricultural lime value chain efficiency for reducing soil acidity in Ethiopia.Soil security · 2023Article
- Transitions to adulthood: self-governance and disciplining in the making of patient citizens.Sociology of health & illness · 2020Article
- Syncretic Ethnic Identities in Dilemmatic Fields: Constructing and Reconciling Ethnic Differences in Schooling.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2020Article
- The Endurance and Contestations of Colonial Constructions of Race Among Malaysians and Singaporeans.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Beyond Verbal Narratives: Using Timeline Images in the Semiotic Cultural Study of Meaning Making.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2018Review
- The Body That Speaks: Recombining Bodies and Speech Sources in Unscripted Face-to-Face Communication.Frontiers in psychology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
'Multivoicedness' and the 'multivoiced Self' have become important theoretical concepts guiding research. Drawing on the tradition of dialogism, the Self is conceptualised as being constituted by a multiplicity of dynamic, interacting voices. Despite the growth in literature and empirical research, there remains a paucity of established methodological tools for analysing the multivoiced Self using qualitative data. In this article, we set out a systematic, practical 'how-to' guide for analysing multivoicedness. Using theoretically derived tools, our three-step method comprises: identifying the voices of I-positions within the Self's talk (or text), identifying the voices of 'inner-Others', and examining the dialogue and relationships between the different voices. We elaborate each step and illustrate our method using examples from a published paper in which data were analysed using this method. We conclude by offering more general principles for the use of the method and discussing potential applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.