Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26664129›Full record

ArticleMedicine and law2015

A Qualitative Evaluation of Ethics Educational Program in Health Science.

Perihan Elif Ekmekci, Murat Oral, Eray Serdar Yurdakul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine and law, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Perihan Elif EkmekciMD, Head Of European Union Department of Ministry of Health, PhD Student Ankara University, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of History of Medicine and Ethics.
Murat OralPharm. M.Sc., PhD Student Ankara University, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of Pharmacy Management.
Eray Serdar YurdakulMD, PhD Student Gülhane Military Medical Academy, Institute of Health Sciences, Department of History of Medicine and Ethics.

Funding

FOGARTY INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH ETHICS INITIATIVE - TURKEY/C. ASIAR25TW009248 · FIC · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI MUNIR, KERIM M · 2012 to 2016
$972k
FIC NIH HHS R25 TW009248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper originates from a panel discussion on the evaluation of "Ethics Educational Program in Health Sciences" held during the IAEE Conference 2014 Ankara, Turkey. The participants of the panel had consultations to solidify the concepts about the topic. The qualitative data out of these antecedent discussions became mature with the contributions in the panel. The outcome of this qualitative study mainly focuses on the examples of two current curricula; one from PhD on History of Medicine and Medical Ethics, the other one from an elective course on medical ethics as a part of a PhD program on Pharmacy Management and History, followed by the major challenges the trainees face during their education, their expectations and whether the program was satisfactory, the aspects of the programs which are prone to improvement and their overall evaluations of the programs.

Indexed as

adult educationEthics curriculaEthics educationHistory of Medicinemedical ethics

Identifiers

PMID26664129
PMCPMC4671631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.