Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26664105›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2015

The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test improves the predictive value of previous exacerbations for poor outcomes in COPD.

Marc Miravitlles, Patricia García-Sidro, Alonso Fernández-Nistal, María Jesús Buendía, María José Espinosa de Los Monteros, Cristina Esquinas, Jesús Molina

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effect of dyspnea on frailty stages and related factors in Taiwanese men with COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018
    Observational
  12. Observational
  13. Depressive status explains a significant amount of the variance in COPD assessment test (CAT) scores.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018
    Observational
  14. Risk factors for FEVInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2017
    Article
  15. Impact and prevention of severe exacerbations of COPD: a review of the evidence.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marc MiravitllesPneumology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Ciber de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Barcelona, Spain.
Patricia García-SidroPneumology Unit, Hospital de la Plana, Villareal, Spain.
Alonso Fernández-NistalMedical Department, Takeda Farmacéutica España S.A., Madrid, Spain.
María Jesús BuendíaPneumology Department, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
María José Espinosa de Los MonterosPneumology Department, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain.
Cristina EsquinasPneumology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Ciber de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Barcelona, Spain.
Jesús MolinaCentro de Salud "Francia", Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations have a negative impact on the quality of life of patients and the evolution of the disease. We have investigated the prognostic value of several health-related quality of life questionnaires to predict the appearance of a composite event (new ambulatory or emergency exacerbation, hospitalization, or death) over a 1-year follow-up.

methodsThis was a multicenter, prospective, observational study. Patients completed four questionnaires after recovering from an exacerbation (COPD Assessment Test [CAT], a Clinical COPD Questionnaire [CCQ], COPD Severity Score [COPDSS], and Airways Questionnaire [AQ20]). Patients were followed-up until the appearance of the composite event or for 1 year, whichever came first.

resultsA total of 497 patients were included in the study. The majority of them were men (89.7%), with a mean age of 68.7 (SD 9.2) years, and a forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 47.1% (SD 17.5%). A total of 303 (61%) patients experienced a composite event. Patients with an event had worse mean scores of all questionnaires at baseline compared to patients without event: CAT=12.5 vs 11.3 (P=0.028); CCQ=2.2 vs 1.9 (P=0.013); COPDSS=12.3 vs 10.9 (P=0.001); AQ20=8.3 vs 7.5 (P=0.048). In the multivariate analysis, only previous history of exacerbations and CAT score ≥13.5 were significant risk factors for the composite event. A CAT score ≥13.5 increased the predictive value of previous exacerbations with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.864 (95% CI: 0.829-0.899; P=0.001).

conclusionThe predictive value of previous exacerbations significantly increased only in one of the four trialled questionnaires, namely in the CAT questionnaire. However, previous history of exacerbations was the strongest predictor of the composite event.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAgedChi-Square DistributionDisease ProgressionFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHospitalizationHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLungMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsAQ20CATCCQCOPDCOPDSSexacerbations

Identifiers

PMID26664105
PMCPMC4670021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.