Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26663913›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

Cell membrane deformation and bioeffects produced by tandem bubble-induced jetting flow.

Fang Yuan, Chen Yang, Pei Zhong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Three-dimensional array of microbubbles sonoporation of cells in microfluidics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Electrochemical fabrication of TiOMaterials chemistry and physics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fang YuanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
Chen YangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708.
Pei ZhongDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708 pzhong@duke.edu.

Funding

Innovations in Shock Wave Lithotripsy TechnologyR37DK052985 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHONG, PEI · 2010 to 2019
$5.9M
Probing the Bioeffects of Cavitation at Single-Cell LevelR03EB017886 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHONG, PEI · 2014 to 2015
$158k
NIBIB NIH HHS R03 EB017886NIBIB NIH HHS R03-EB017886-01A1NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK052985NIDDK NIH HHS R37-DK052985-18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cavitation with bubble-bubble interaction is a fundamental feature in therapeutic ultrasound. However, the causal relationships between bubble dynamics, associated flow motion, cell deformation, and resultant bioeffects are not well elucidated. Here, we report an experimental system for tandem bubble (TB; maximum diameter = 50 ± 2 μm) generation, jet formation, and subsequent interaction with single HeLa cells patterned on fibronectin-coated islands (32 × 32 μm) in a microfluidic chip. We have demonstrated that pinpoint membrane poration can be produced at the leading edge of the HeLa cell in standoff distance Sd ≤ 30 μm, driven by the transient shear stress associated with TB-induced jetting flow. The cell membrane deformation associated with a maximum strain rate on the order of 10(4) s(-1) was heterogeneous. The maximum area strain ([Formula: see text]) decreased exponentially with Sd (also influenced by adhesion pattern), a feature that allows us to create distinctly different treatment outcome (i.e., necrosis, repairable poration, or nonporation) in individual cells. More importantly, our results suggest that membrane poration and cell survival are better correlated with area strain integral ([Formula: see text]) instead of [Formula: see text], which is characteristic of the response of materials under high strain-rate loadings. For 50% cell survival the corresponding area strain integral was found to vary in the range of 56 ∼ 123 μs with [Formula: see text] in the range of 57 ∼ 87%. Finally, significant variations in individual cell's response were observed at the same Sd, indicating the potential for using this method to probe mechanotransduction at the single cell level.

Indexed as

Biophysical PhenomenaCell MembraneHeLa CellsHumansLab-On-A-Chip DevicesMicrofluidicsSingle-Cell AnalysisUltrasonicscavitation bioeffectscell mechanicshigh strain-ratemicrofluidicssingle-cell analysis

Identifiers

PMID26663913
PMCPMC4697429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.