Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26662926›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood2016

Risk and protective factors for falls on stairs in young children: multicentre case-control study.

D Kendrick, K Zou, J Ablewhite, M Watson, C Coupland, B Kay, A Hawkins, R Reading

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cost-effectiveness of the 'Stay One Step Ahead' Home Safety programme for the prevention of injuries among children under 5 years.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effectiveness of systematically delivered evidence-based home safety promotion to improve child home safety practices: a controlled before-and-after study.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

D KendrickDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK.
K ZouDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK.
J AblewhiteDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK.
M WatsonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.
C CouplandDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, Nottingham, UK.
B KayEmergency Department, Bristol Children's Hospital, Bristol, UK.
A HawkinsGreat North Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Research Unit Level 2, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
R ReadingJenny Lind Paediatric Department, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norfolk Community Health and Care NHS Trust, Norwich, UK.

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate risk and protective factors for stair falls in children aged <5 years.

methodsMulticentre case-control study at hospitals, minor injury units and general practices in and around four UK study centres. Cases were children with medically attended stair fall injuries. Controls were matched on age, sex, calendar time and study centre. A total of 610 cases and 2658 controls participated.

resultsCases' most common injuries were bangs on the head (66%), cuts/grazes not requiring stitches (14%) and fractures (12%). Parents of cases were significantly more likely not to have stair gates (adjusted OR (AOR) 2.50, 95% CI 1.90 to 3.29; population attributable fraction (PAF) 21%) or to leave stair gates open (AOR 3.09, 95% CI 2.39 to 4.00; PAF 24%) both compared with having closed stair gates. They were more likely not to have carpeted stairs (AOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.10; PAF 5%) and not to have a landing part-way up their stairs (AOR 1.34, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.65; PAF 18%). They were more likely to consider their stairs unsafe to use (AOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.99; PAF 5%) or to be in need of repair (AOR 1.71, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.50; PAF 5%).

conclusionStructural factors including having landings part-way up the stairs and keeping stairs in good repair were associated with reduced stair fall injury risk. Family factors including having stair gates, not leaving gates open and having stair carpets were associated with reduced injury risk. If these associations are causal, addressing these factors in housing policy and routine child health promotion could reduce stair fall injuries.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAccidents, HomeCase-Control StudiesChild, PreschoolEmergency Service, HospitalFamily CharacteristicsHousehold ArticlesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornProtective DevicesProtective FactorsRisk FactorsStair ClimbingUnited Kingdomcase-controlfallsrisk factorsstairs

Identifiers

PMID26662926
PMCPMC5050281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.