Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26662809›Full record

Trial reportEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2016

Multi-dimensional Treatment Foster Care in England: differential effects by level of initial antisocial behaviour.

Ian Sinclair, Elizabeth Parry, Nina Biehal, John Fresen, Catherine Kay, Stephen Scott, Jonathan Green

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evidence Base Update of Psychosocial Treatments for Adolescents with Disruptive Behavior.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53 · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ian SinclairSocial Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, England, UK. ian.sinclair@york.ac.uk.
Elizabeth ParryUniversity of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Nina BiehalSocial Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, England, UK.
John FresenUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Catherine KayUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Stephen ScottInstitute of Psychiatry, London, UK.
Jonathan GreenUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
University of Manchester · GBUniversity of York · GBPsychiatry Research Trust · GBUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-dimensional Treatment Foster Care (MTFC), recently renamed Treatment Foster Care Oregon for Adolescents (TFCO-A) is an internationally recognised intervention for troubled young people in public care. This paper seeks to explain conflicting results with MTFC by testing the hypotheses that it benefits antisocial young people more than others and does so through its effects on their behaviour. Hard-to-manage young people in English foster or residential homes were assessed at entry to a randomised and case-controlled trial of MTFC (n = 88) and usual care (TAU) (n = 83). Primary outcome was the Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) at 12 months analysed according to high (n = 112) or low (n = 59) baseline level of antisocial behaviour on the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents. After adjusting for covariates, there was no overall treatment effect on CGAS. However, the High Antisocial Group receiving MTFC gained more on the CGAS than the Low group (mean improvement 9.36 points vs. 5.33 points). This difference remained significant (p < 0.05) after adjusting for propensity and covariates and was statistically explained by the reduced antisocial behaviour ratings in MTFC. These analyses support the use of MTFC for youth in public care but only for those with higher levels of antisocial behaviour. Further work is needed on whether such benefits persist, and on possible negative effects of this treatment for those with low antisocial behaviour.Trial Registry Name: ISRCTNRegistry identification number: ISRCTN 68038570Registry URL: www.isrctn.com.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsOutcome Assessment, Health CareSocial SkillsAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorChildChild BehaviorConduct DisorderEnglandFemaleFoster Home CareHumansMaleProblem BehaviorAntisocial behaviourConduct disorderControlled trialMTFCTFCO-ATreatment interaction

Identifiers

PMID26662809
PMCPMC4967090
OpenAlexW2191182944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.