Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26662570›Full record

ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2016

Impact of IGF-1, IGF-1R, and IGFBP-3 promoter methylation on the risk and prognosis of esophageal carcinoma.

Peng Ye, Chang-Fa Qu, Xue-Lin Hu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peng YeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310003, People's Republic of China.
Chang-Fa QuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Haping Road, No. 150, Nangang Area, Harbin, 150080, People's Republic of China. quchangfa1113@163.com.
Xue-Lin HuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The No. 1 People's Hospital of Zhangjiagang, Zhangjiagang, 215600, China.
Harbin Medical University · CNZhangjiagang First People's Hospital · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate IGF-1, IGF-1R, and IGFBP-3 methylations in esophageal carcinoma (EC) patients and their relationship with the development and prognosis of EC. This study population consisted of 264 patients (case group) whom EC radical resection was performed and 283 healthy individuals (control group). Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) detected the methylation status of IGF-1, IGF-1R, and IGFBP-3 in the peripheral blood in both groups. The expressions of IGF-1, IGF-1R, and IGFBP-3 in EC and adjacent normal tissues were detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The methylation rates of IGF-1, IGF-1R, IGFBP3, and IGF-1 + IGF1R + IGFBP3 in the case group were higher than those in the control group (all P < 0.05). Additionally, there were statistical significances for the methylation rates of IGF-1, IGF-1R, IGFBP3, and IGF-1 + IGF1R + IGFBP3 IGF-1 among patients of different clinicopathological features (all P < 0.05). The positive expression rates of IGF-1 and IGF-1R in EC were significantly higher than those in adjacent normal tissues (both P < 0.001), and the rate of IGFBP-3 in EC was significantly lower than that in adjacent normal tissues (P < 0.05). Correlation analysis showed that IGF-1 and IGF1R gene promoter methylation was positively correlated with the positive expressions of IGF-1 (r = 0.139, P = 0.024) and IGF-1R (r = 0.135, P = 0.028), while the IGFBP3 methylation was negatively correlated with the positive expression of IGFBP3 (r = -0.133, P = 0.031). The positive expressions of IGF-1, IGF-1R, and IGFBP-3 were related to different clinicopathological features (all P < 0.05). Cox multivariate analysis results showed that methylation status of IGF-1, IGF-1R, and IGF-1 + IGF1R + IGFBP3 ; expressions of IGF-1 and IGF-1R protein; infiltration depth; and lymph node metastasis (LNM) were independent factors of EC prognosis. Our study demonstrated that methylation of IGF-1, IGF1R, IGFBP3, and IGF-1 + IGF1R + IGFBP3 was closely linked with the occurrence of EC and patients' clinicopathological features. Besides, the methylation status of the target genes and the expressions of IGF-1 and IGF-1R protein were independent factors of EC prognosis, which could provide a direction for the prognosis and treatment of EC.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationPromoter Regions, GeneticAgedCase-Control StudiesEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene ExpressionGenetic Association StudiesHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3Insulin-Like Growth Factor IMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm MetastasisInsulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3Insulin-Like Growth Factor IReceptor, IGF Type 1Clinicopathological featuresEsophageal carcinomaIGF-1IGF-1RIGFBP-3MethylationPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID26662570
OpenAlexW2298145568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.