Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26662471›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2015

Ascorbic acid for the treatment of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

Burkhard Gess, Jonathan Baets, Peter De Jonghe, Mary M Reilly, Davide Pareyson, Peter Young

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07029620 (Evaluation and Rehabilitation of Patients With Peripheral Neuropathy Using Static and Dynamic Stabilometric Platforms), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07029620 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation and Rehabilitation of Patients With Peripheral Neuropathy Using Static and Dynamic Stabilometric Platforms: NEUROSTAB

TypeinterventionalSponsorOspedale Policlinico San MartinoRan2025 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsRehabilitation, BalanceArmsBalance and postural rehabilitation using sensor-based stabilometric platform (GEAMASTER) under static and dynamic conditions, Conventional balance and gait rehabilitation program, Stabilometric assessment in healthy volunteers
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies for neuromuscular diseases.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Mechanisms and Treatments in Demyelinating CMT.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Burkhard GessDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, Aachen, Germany, 52074.
Jonathan Baets
Peter De Jonghe
Mary M Reilly
Davide Pareyson
Peter Young
Antwerp University Hospital · BENational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBRWTH Aachen University · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DEUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K000608/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCharcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) comprises a large group of different forms of hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy. The molecular basis of several CMT subtypes has been clarified during the last 20 years. Since slowly progressive muscle weakness and sensory disturbances are the main features of these syndromes, treatments aim to improve motor impairment and sensory disturbances to improve abilities. Pharmacological treatment trials in CMT are rare. This review was derived from a Cochrane review, Treatment for Charcot Marie Tooth disease, which will be updated via this review and a forthcoming title, Treatments other than ascorbic acid for Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

objectivesTo assess the effects of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) treatment for CMT. SEARCH

methodsOn 21 September 2015, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of treatment for CMT. We also checked clinical trials registries for ongoing studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs and quasi-RCTs of any ascorbic acid treatment for people with CMT. Where a study aimed to evaluate the treatment of general neuromuscular symptoms of people with peripheral neuropathy including CMT, we included the study if we were able to identify the effect of treatment in the CMT group. We did not include observational studies or case reports of ascorbic acid treatment in people with CMT. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors (BG and JB) independently extracted the data and assessed study quality. MAIN

resultsSix RCTs compared the effect of oral ascorbic acid (1 to 4 grams) and placebo treatment in CMT1A. In five trials involving adults with CMT1A, a total of 622 participants received ascorbic acid or placebo. Trials were largely at low risk of bias. There is high-quality evidence that ascorbic acid does not improve the course of CMT1A in adults as measured by the CMT neuropathy score (0 to 36 scale) at 12 months (mean difference (MD) -0.37; 95% confidence intervals (CI) -0.83 to 0.09; five studies; N = 533), or at 24 months (MD -0.21; 95% CI -0.81 to 0.39; three studies; N = 388). Ascorbic acid treatment showed a positive effect on the nine-hole peg test versus placebo (MD -1.16 seconds; 95% CI -1.96 to -0.37), but the clinical significance of this result is probably small. Meta-analyses of other secondary outcome parameters showed no relevant benefit of ascorbic acid. In one trial, 80 children with CMT1A received ascorbic acid or placebo. The trial showed no clinical benefit of ascorbic acid treatment. Adverse effects did not differ in their nature or abundance between ascorbic acid and placebo. AUTHORS'

conclusionsHigh-quality evidence indicates that ascorbic acid does not improve the course of CMT1A in adults in terms of the outcome parameters used. According to low-quality evidence, ascorbic acid does not improve the course of CMT1A in children. However, CMT1A is slowly progressive and the outcome parameters show only small change over time. Longer study durations should be considered, and outcome parameters more sensitive to change over time should be designed and validated for future studies.

Indexed as

AdultAscorbic AcidCharcot-Marie-Tooth DiseaseHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAscorbic Acid

Identifiers

PMID26662471
PMCPMC6823270
OpenAlexW2232967179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.