ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2016
Safe use of iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast media in current practice in Japan: a questionnaire survey.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic value of the inner ear computed tomography measurements in detecting congenital sensorineural hearing loss: a comparative study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Predicting strangulated small bowel obstruction: how the combination of CT findings with clinical and laboratory parameters improves diagnostic accuracy.Emergency radiology · 2026Article
- Computed tomography value ascites and mesenteric fluid predict intestinal necrosis in strangulated small bowel obstruction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Changes in renal function over time in outpatients with eGFR ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 mJapanese journal of radiology · 2023Observational
- Ischemia prediction score (IsPS) in patients with strangulated small bowel obstruction: a retrospective cohort study.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Article
- The Japanese Breast Cancer Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, 2018 Edition.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2020Article
- Practical administration of intravenous contrast media in children: screening, prophylaxis, administration and treatment of adverse reactions.Pediatric radiology · 2019Review
- Post-marketing surveillance of gadobutrol for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in Japan.Japanese journal of radiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo help establish consensus on the safe use of contrast media in Japan. MATERIALS AND
methodsQuestionnaires were sent to accredited teaching hospitals with radiology residency programs.
resultsThe reply rate was 45.4% (329/724). For contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), chronic and acute kidney diseases were considered a risk factor in 96.7 and 93.6%, respectively, and dehydration in 73.9%. As preventive actions, intravenous hydration (89.1%) and reduction of iodinated contrast media dose (86.9%) were commonly performed. For nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), chronic and acute kidney diseases were considered risk factors in 98.5 and 90.6%, respectively, but use of unstable gadolinium-based contrast media was considered a risk factor in only 55.6%. A renal function test was always (63.5% in iodinated; 65.7% in gadolinium) or almost always (23.1; 19.8%) performed, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was the parameter most frequently used (80.8; 82.6%). For the patients with risk factors for acute adverse reaction (AAR), steroid premedication or/and change of contrast medium were frequent preventive actions, but intravenous steroid administration immediately before contrast media use was still performed.
conclusionOur questionnaire survey revealed that preventive actions against CIN were properly performed based on patients' eGFR. Preventive actions against NSF and AAR still lacked consensus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26662468What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.