Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26662200›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Renal physiology2016

Discerning the role of mechanosensors in regulating proximal tubule function.

Venkatesan Raghavan, Ora A Weisz

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physiology. Renal physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Biology of the proximal tubule in body homeostasis and kidney disease.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nephroprotective Effect of the Leaf Extract ofJournal of experimental pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Venkatesan RaghavanRenal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania venkateshrag@gmail.com.
Ora A WeiszRenal-Electrolyte Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Single Nephron and MetabolomicsP30DK079307 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLEYMAN, THOMAS R · 2008 to 2022
$13.4M
Flow-stimulated endocytosis in the proximal tubuleR01DK101484 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WEISZ, ORA A · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK101484NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079307NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK101484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All cells in the body experience external mechanical forces such as shear stress and stretch. These forces are sensed by specialized structures in the cell known as mechanosensors. Cells lining the proximal tubule (PT) of the kidney are continuously exposed to variations in flow rates of the glomerular ultrafiltrate, which manifest as changes in axial shear stress and radial stretch. Studies suggest that these cells respond acutely to variations in flow by modulating their ion transport and endocytic functions to maintain glomerulotubular balance. Conceptually, changes in the axial shear stress in the PT could be sensed by three known structures, namely, the microvilli, the glycocalyx, and primary cilia. The orthogonal component of the force produced by flow exhibits as radial stretch and can cause expansion of the tubule. Forces of stretch are transduced by integrins, by stretch-activated channels, and by cell-cell contacts. This review summarizes our current understanding of flow sensing in PT epithelia, discusses challenges in dissecting the role of individual flow sensors in the mechanosensitive responses, and identifies potential areas of opportunity for new study.

Indexed as

Mechanotransduction, CellularAnimalsEpithelial CellsHumansIntegrinsIntercellular JunctionsIon Channel GatingIon ChannelsKidney Tubules, ProximalMechanoreceptorsPressureStress, MechanicalIntegrinsIon Channelscalciumciliaendocytosisglycocalyxmechanical stretchmechanosensationmicrovillishear stress

Identifiers

PMID26662200
PMCPMC4675802
OpenAlexW2268538914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.