Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26662101›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2016

In situ bioavailability of DDT and Hg in sediments of the Toce River (Lake Maggiore basin, Northern Italy): accumulation in benthic invertebrates and passive samplers.

Francesca Pisanello, Laura Marziali, Federica Rosignoli, Giulia Poma, Claudio Roscioli, Fiorenzo Pozzoni, Licia Guzzella

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesca PisanelloWater Research Institute, National Research Council, Via del Mulino 19, 20861, Brugherio, MB, Italy. pisanello@irsa.cnr.it.
Laura MarzialiWater Research Institute, National Research Council, Via del Mulino 19, 20861, Brugherio, MB, Italy. marziali@irsa.cnr.it.
Federica RosignoliWater Research Institute, National Research Council, Via del Mulino 19, 20861, Brugherio, MB, Italy.
Giulia PomaToxicological Center, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium.
Claudio RoscioliWater Research Institute, National Research Council, Via del Mulino 19, 20861, Brugherio, MB, Italy.
Fiorenzo PozzoniWater Research Institute, National Research Council, Via del Mulino 19, 20861, Brugherio, MB, Italy.
Licia GuzzellaWater Research Institute, National Research Council, Via del Mulino 19, 20861, Brugherio, MB, Italy.
Water Research Institute · ITNational Research Council · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DDT and mercury (Hg) contamination in the Toce River (Northern Italy) was caused by a factory producing technical DDT and using a mercury-cell chlor-alkali plant. In this study, DDT and Hg contamination and bioavailability were assessed by using different approaches: (1) direct evaluation of sediment contamination, (2) assessment of bioaccumulation in native benthic invertebrates belonging to different taxonomic/functional groups, and (3) evaluation of the in situ bioavailability of DDT and Hg using passive samplers. Sampling sites were selected upstream and downstream the industrial plant along the river axis. Benthic invertebrates (Gammaridae, Heptageniidae, and Diptera) and sediments were collected in three seasons and analyzed for DDT and Hg content and the results were used to calculate the biota sediment accumulation factor (BSAF). Polyethylene passive samplers (PEs) for DDT and diffusive gradients in thin films (DGTs) for Hg were deployed in sediments to estimate the concentration of the toxicants in pore water. Analysis for (DDx) were performed using GC-MS. Accuracy was within ±30 % of the certified values and precision was >20 % relative standard deviation (RSD). Total mercury concentrations were determined using an automated Hg mercury analyzer. Precision was >5 % and accuracy was within ±10 % of certified values. The results of all the approaches (analysis of sediment, biota, and passive samplers) showed an increasing contamination from upstream to downstream sites. BSAF values revealed the bioavailability of both contaminants in the study sites, with values up to 49 for DDx and up to 3.1 for Hg. No correlation was found between values in sediments and the organisms. Concentrations calculated using passive samplers were correlated with values in benthic invertebrates, while no correlation was found with concentrations in sediments. Thus, direct analysis of toxicant in sediments does not provide a measurement of bioavailability. On the contrary, analysis of bioaccumulation in benthic organisms provides the most realistic picture of the site-specific bioavailability of DDx and Hg, but this approach is time-consuming and not always feasible. On the other hand, the in situ deployment of passive samplers proved to be a powerful tool, providing a good surrogate measure of bioaccumulation.

Indexed as

DDTMercuryWater Pollutants, ChemicalAnimalsBiological AvailabilityBiotaGeologic SedimentsInvertebratesItalyRiversDDTMercuryWater Pollutants, ChemicalAquatic invertebratesBioaccumulationDDTHgIn situ bioavailabilityPassive samplers

Identifiers

PMID26662101
OpenAlexW2266102869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.