Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26661952›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2016

Multicenter review: role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in diagnostic evaluation, pre-procedural planning and follow-up for patients with congenital heart disease.

Nicolò Schicchi, Aurelio Secinaro, Giuseppe Muscogiuri, Paolo Ciliberti, Benedetta Leonardi, Teresa Santangelo, Carmela Napolitano, Giacomo Agliata, Maria Chiara Basile, Francesca Guidi and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Impact of ferumoxytol vs gadolinium on 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance measurements in small children with congenital heart disease.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Nicolò SchicchiRadiologia Pediatrica e Specialistica, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Via Conca 71, Torrette, 60126, Ancona, Italy. schicchi.n@alice.it.
Aurelio SecinaroDepartment of Imaging, Bambino Gesù-Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe MuscogiuriDepartment of Imaging, Bambino Gesù-Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Paolo CilibertiDepartment Medical and Surgical of Pediatric Cardiology, Bambino Gesù-Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Benedetta LeonardiDepartment Medical and Surgical of Pediatric Cardiology, Bambino Gesù-Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Teresa SantangeloDepartment of Imaging, Bambino Gesù-Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Carmela NapolitanoDepartment of Imaging, Bambino Gesù-Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giacomo AgliataScuola di Specializzazione in Radiodiagnostica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Maria Chiara BasileScuola di Specializzazione in Radiodiagnostica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Francesca GuidiScuola di Specializzazione in Radiodiagnostica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Paolo TomàDepartment of Imaging, Bambino Gesù-Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Andrea GiovagnoniRadiologia Pediatrica e Specialistica, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Via Conca 71, Torrette, 60126, Ancona, Italy.
Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITMarche Polytechnic University · ITAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITOspedali Riuniti di Ancona · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) is rapidly increasing in the adult population, mainly due to the improved long-term survival. Serial follow-up with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is very appealing due to its non-invasive nature. CMR exam is able to provide specific information about cardiac function, hemodynamics, anatomy and tissue characterization unlikely achievable by other diagnostic techniques. CMR in CHD plays a role both in early diagnosis and in post-operative follow-up. Black Blood T1 weighted sequences are used to acquire morphological information. Cine Steady State Free Precession sequences are mainly used to provide data about cardiac function and kinesis. Hemodynamic assessment is routinely performed using phase contrast sequences, which provide reliable information concerning vessel flow pattern, cardiac output and intracardiac shunts. Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) and 3D coronary MRA of the whole thorax can provide detailed morphological information regarding great vessels and proximal coronary arteries. Presence of late gadolinium enhancement suggesting myocardial macroscopic fibrosis seems to play a prognostic and diagnostic role even in this field.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance AngiographyMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineChildContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialEarly DiagnosisFollow-Up StudiesGadoliniumHeart Defects, CongenitalHemodynamicsHumansItalyPredictive Value of TestsPrevalencePrognosisSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaGadoliniumCardiac magnetic resonanceCongenital heart diseasePediatric imaging

Identifiers

PMID26661952
OpenAlexW2253693586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.