Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26661947›Full record

ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2016

[Appendectomy in surgical residency. What has changed over the past 10 years?].

T Huber, M Paschold, F Bartsch, H Lang, W Kneist

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. ["I will do laparoscopy somewhere else" : Total, highly immersive virtual reality without side effects?]Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017
    Article
  4. [Transparent operative training in visceral surgery : Analysis at a German university medical center].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

T HuberKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
M PascholdKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
F BartschKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
H LangKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
W KneistKlinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland. werner.kneist@unimedizin-mainz.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical residents need to train laparoscopic skills for minimally invasive procedures at an early stage. The aim of this study was the investigation and assessment of appendectomy carried out at a university medical center over the previous decade regarding the frequency of operations by residents in training and the type of surgical technique used (laparoscopic vs. open).

methodsA retrospective analysis of appendectomies carried out from 2005 to 2014 at the clinic for general, visceral and transplant surgery was performed. Operators were stratified into two groups (group 1: residents and group 2: fellows/attending surgeons). Surgery was classified as laparoscopic or open appendectomy.

resultsOut of 1,587 appendectomies analyzed 946 were performed laparoscopically (59.6 %). The percentage of laparoscopic appendectomies increased significantly over the decade analyzed (p < 0.001) and reached 94.4 % in 2014. From 2005 until 2007 the rate of appendectomies by residents was 17.9 % (77 out of 430). Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in 5.8 % and was only performed by fellows or attending surgeons. From 2008 to 2014 the rate of surgeries by residents significantly increased (p < 0.001) and accounted for 57.6 % (range 19.4-66.9 %).

conclusionRegardless of the surgical technique used, appendectomy is still a primary training operation for surgical residents. An early and focused training of minimally invasive visceral surgery in the new regulations for continuing medical education starts with laparoscopic appendectomy.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersAdolescentAdultAgedAppendectomyAppendicitisCurriculumFellowships and ScholarshipsFemaleForecastingGermanyHumansInternship and ResidencyLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleAppendectomyLaparoscopyMinimally invasive surgerySurgical residentsSurgical training

Identifiers

PMID26661947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.