Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26661622›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2016

Fatalism Revisited: Further Psychometric Testing Across Two Studies.

Sue P Heiney, Mary Gullatte, Pearman D Hayne, Barbara Powe, Brian Habing

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Impact of Tailored Interventions on Receipt of a Preference-Concordant Colorectal Cancer Screening Test.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sue P HeineyCollege of Nursing, University of South Carolina, 1601 Greene Street, Room 617, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA. heineys@mailbox.sc.edu.
Mary GullatteEmory Healthcare, 235 Peachtree Street NE, North Tower, 5th Floor, Room 531, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.
Pearman D HayneCollege of Nursing, University of South Carolina, 1601 Greene Street, Room 302-F, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Barbara Powe, Lilburn, GA, 30047, USA.
Brian HabingDepartment of Statistics, University of South Carolina, 1523 Greene Street, Room 208-A, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer fatalism may impact outcomes, particularly for African American (AA) women with breast cancer (BrCa). We examined the psychometrics of the modified Powe Fatalism Inventory in sample of AA women with BrCa from two studies. Only the predetermination and God's will items satisfy the conditions to be classified as a strong subscale. Our analysis identified that five items had strong psychometric properties for measuring fatalism for AA women with BrCa. However, these items do not include all the defining attributes of fatalism. A strong measure of fatalism strengthens our understanding of how this concept influences AA patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthReligionSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlack or African AmericanBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPsychometricsAfrican AmericanBreast cancerCancer fatalismScale validation

Identifiers

PMID26661622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.